Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2246 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2023
1
OD - 16
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
ORIGINAL SIDE
WPO(P)/4/2023
BISWAJIT GOSWAMI
-Versus-
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
BEFORE :
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
And
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Date : 23rd August, 2023
Appearance :
Mr.Tapas Dutta, Adv.
..for the petitioner.
Mr. Sirsanya Bandyapadhyay, Adv.
Mr.Arka Kumar Nag, Adv.
...for the State.
Mr. Brojesh Jha, Adv.
..for the Union of India.
The Court : This writ petition styled as public
interest litigation has been filed challenging the nomination
of the appellate authority under the Right to Information Act
as a pradhan of a gram panchayat and in this regard the
petitioner has referred to the notification issued by the
Government of West Bengal dated 21st October, 2010. The entire
case of the petitioner rests upon a decision of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of Namit Sharma Vs. Union of India
reported at (2013) 1 SCC 745 more particularly the directions
2
issued in paragraph 108.7. Based on the observations and/or
directions, the learned advocate for the petitioner would
strenuously contend that the appellate authority cannot be a
pradhan of a gram panchayat who do not possess the law
qualification and such notification issued by the Government
of West Bengal is illegal.
The learned government counsel for the respondent
would point out that the decision in Namit Sharma Vs. Union of
India reported in (2013) 1 SCC 745 is no longer good law in
the light of the Act. At the instance of the Union of India, a
review application was filed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court
and in the decision in Union of India Vs. Namit Sharma
reported in 2013(10) SCC 359 the judgment reported in (2013) 1
SCC 745 was recalled and all the directions issued in
paragraph 108.7 in the decision reported at (2013) 1 SCC 745
were recalled and set aside. This, the very basis and
foundation of the writ petition is thoroughly misconceived and
no relief can be granted in this public interest litigation.
No other grounds urged in this writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) S.Das/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!