Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 899 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 16 March, 2022
OD-2
APOT/39/2021
WITH
WPO/44/2021
IA No.GA/1/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
ORIGINAL SIDE
MEHERAJ ALI
VS.
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
BEFORE:
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SUBRATA TALUKDAR
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO Date: March 16, 2022.
Appearance:
Mr. Sankar Nath Mukherjee, Adv.
Sk. Samim Akhter, Adv.
Ms. Mousumi Das, Adv.
... for the appellant
Mr. Amal Kr. Sen, Adv.
Mr. Lal Mohan Basu, Adv.
... for the State
The Court: Party/parties is/are represented in the order of their
name/names as printed above in the cause title.
The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 2nd March, 2021 of the
Hon'ble Single Bench. Although this Court finds that the order dated 2nd
March, 2021 does not determine the rights of either of the parties qualifying to
be a judgment within the meaning of Clause15 of the Letters Patent, having
regard to the subsequent facts brought to the notice of this Court, this appeal is
taken up for adjudication.
The short question ventilated by the appellant relates to the
consideration of the application of the appellant by the State Transport
Authority (STA) vide its meeting dated 19th March, 2020.
The appellant, appearing through Mr. Mukherjee, learned counsel
and assisted by Mr. Akhter, learned counsel, submits that although his
application for grant of permit was accepted in principle, such was not granted
till the appellant produced a No-Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Regional
Transport Authority (RTA), Kolkata comprising one of the major portions of the
route alignment of the permit in issue.
Mr. Mukherjee points out on the basis of records of another meeting
of the STA dated 27th September, 2019 at serial 97 thereof, that the
requirement of obtaining a NOC from the Kolkata region was not insisted upon
and the appellant at serial no.97 of the resolution dated 27th September, 2019
was only called upon to submit an acceptable route alignment.
Mr. Mukherjee prays for a similar treatment.
Mr. Sen, learned Additional Government Pleader assisted by Mr. Lal
Mohan Basu, Learned State advocate, submits that the matter may be
reconsidered by the STA provided the route alignment of the appellant does not
infringe or encroach or violate the areas prohibited by Notifications of the
Transport Department of the Government.
In the light of the above discussion, this matter stands remanded to
the STA holding that the STA shall not insist upon the present appellant to
produce a NOC from the RTA, Kolkata Region. The appellant shall, however, be
bound by the provisions of the Notification restricting plying of stage carriages
on routes as applicable to the permit sought by him. It is a matter of record
that the only issue before this Court was the requirement of the NOC by the
STA in terms of the resolution dated 19th March, 2020 and other conditions in
the resolution dated 19th March, 2020 remain untouched by this order.
APOT/39/2021 with IA No. GA/1/2021 accordingly stand
disposed of.
Since no affidavits are called for, all other allegations are denied.
In view of this order, nothing further remains to be decided in the
writ petition, i.e. WPO/44/2021, which also stands disposed of.
All parties are to act on a server copy of this order.
(KRISHNA RAO, J.) (SUBRATA TALUKDAR, J. ) kc
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!