Pranabir Das vs The Durgapur Projects Limited & ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 1649 Cal

     57
29.03.2022
 Ct. No.23
     pg.
                        IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                       CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
                                APPELLATE SIDE
                                  WPA 5326 of 2022
                                   Pranabir Das
                                        Vs.
                         The Durgapur Projects Limited & Ors.

                       Mr. Siddhartha Sarkar
                                  ... For the petitioner
                       Mr. Sujit Sankar Koley
                                   ... For the respondents

Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on

record.

The petitioner was an employee in Durgapur

Projects Limited (in short "DPL"), the respondent no.1. The

petitioner retired from service on 30th November, 2020. The

petitioner on his retirement was entitled to payment of

gratuity of Rs.9,34,154/-. This figure is not in dispute. The

petitioner was paid this amount on 6th July, 2021 towards

gratuity. The date of payment is also not in dispute. The

petitioner says that there has been a delay of about 7

months in making of the said sum of Rs.9,34,154/- on

account of gratuity. The petitioner further says that he has

not been paid the amount due on account of leave salary.

The petitioner, therefor, is entitled to interest for delayed

payment of gratuity as per the provisions of Section 7(3A)

of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred

to as the "said Act") since the same is part of the retiral

benefits.

It further appears from a memo dated 21st April,

2021 issued by DPL (appearing at page 13 of the writ

petition) that the petitioner is entitled to payment of salary

equivalent to 300 days Earned Leave lying in his credit on

the date of retirement. DPL is liable to pay the said

payment of salary equivalent to 300 days Earned Leave to

the petitioner as such sum has not yet been paid with

interest from the date of retirement till actual payment

since there is no dispute in this regard.

The issues involved in the instant writ petition are

squarely covered by a recent judgment and order of this

Court dated 9th August, 2021 passed in WPA 11485 of

2021 (Kajal Pal v. The Durgapur Projects Ltd. & Ors.). The

consensus between the parties as was in case of Kajal Pal

(supra) is also there in the instant case.

As such, this writ petition is disposed of on the

similar lines as in Kajal Pal (supra), which are as follows:-

The respondent no.1 is directed to pay interest to

the writ petitioner at the rate of 6 per cent per annum on

Rs.9,34,154/- being the amount on account of gratuity

calculated on and from 1st December, 2020 till 6th July,

2021, a sum equivalent to salary for 300 days calculated

on the basis of his last drawn salary with interest @ 6 per

cent per annum from 1st December, 2020 till actual

payment, within a period of six months from the date of

communication of a photostat certified copy of this order

and in default statutory rate of 10 per cent as in case of

gratuity will be attracted on the entire amount from 1st

December, 2020 till 6th July, 2021.

Nothing further remains to be adjudicated in this

writ petition.

Since I have not called for any affidavits,

allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to have

not been admitted by the respondents.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if

applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of

necessary formalities.

(Arindam Mukherjee, J.)