Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1575 Cal
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2022
9
28.3.2022
sb
ct. no. 35
CRA 511 of 2009
In the matter of : Nima Lama & Anr.
.....Appellants
Mr. Himangshu De
Mr. Navanil De
Mr. Rajeshwar Chakraborty
Mr. Subhrajit Dey ....for the Appellants
Mr. Binay Panda
Mr. Pravas Bhattacharya ...for the State
The appeal is listed today for hearing.
Learned advocates for the appellants and learned
advocates for the respondent/State are present before the court.
The appeal has been preferred under Section 374(2) of the
Code of Criminal Procedure against a judgment of conviction
and sentence under Section 304 Part-II/34 of the Indian Penal
Code passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast
Track, 1st Court, Siliguri in Sessions case no. 6 FTC/2003
(sessions trial no. 2/2006).
On 7.8.2009, a rule was issued upon the appellants
calling upon them to show cause as to whether order of sentence
of imprisonment imposed upon them for their conviction under
Section 304 Part-II/34 of the Indian Penal Code passed by the
learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track, 1st Court,
Siliguri, Derjeeling in connection with sessions trial no. 2 of
2006 should not be enhanced and no other further order/orders
be passed as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.
The rule was made returnable within four weeks from date
and that rule and appeal would be heard out together.
Heard the learned advocates for the appellants and
learned advocates for the State at length and in full.
Considered.
Judgment is reserved.
(Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!