Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mriganka Chakravarty vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 123 Cal

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 123 Cal
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2022

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Mriganka Chakravarty vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 18 January, 2022

18th January, 2022 (D/L No.23) (SKB)

W.P.A. 234 of 2022 (Via Video Conference)

Mriganka Chakravarty Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Ms. Sabita Khutia (Bhunya), Mr. Sudip Sarkar ... for the petitioner.

Mr. Pinaki Dhole, Mr. Avisekh Prasad ... for the State.

Affidavit of service filed in court today is kept with

the record.

The material facts of the case are admitted and

hence I have not called for affidavits.

The petitioner was a Cashier of a College in the

district of Nadia and he retired on 31.01.2009. The first

pension payment order was issued on 06.07.2009.

Under ROPA Rules, 2009 there was revision of the

pensionary and gratuity amount payable to the

petitioner. The revised pension payment order was

issued on 26.07.2011 and the arrear pension and

gratuity was disbursed on 29.02.2012 in terms of ROPA,

2009. The petitioner claims interest on delayed

payment of the revised arrear pension and revised

gratuity.

I have heard learned counsel for both parties and I

have considered the orders passed by this court in

similar facts. It is settled law that retired employee is

entitled to some amount of interest on delayed payment

of arrear pension and revised gratuity.

There is considerable delay in filing of the writ

petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating

that there is no statutory period of limitation and

neither parties have suffered due to this delay. It is the

submission of the petitioner that accordingly the

petition should be allowed. The petitioner relies upon

an order in W.P.17557(W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra

Saha Vs. State of West Bengal and others) wherein a

coordinate Bench had relied upon the Supreme Court

judgment in the case of Union of India Vs. Tarsem Singh,

reported in (2008)8 SCC 648 on the issue of limitation

relating to payment on refixation of pay or pension

wherein the Apex Court had held that relief may be

granted in spite of delay as it does not affect the rights

of the third party.

In view of the aforesaid, I direct the Director of

Public Instruction, Government of West Bengal as also

the concerned Treasury Officer to pay interest to the

writ petitioner at the rate of 8 per cent per annum on

the revised arrear pension and revised gratuity

calculated on and from 19th May, 2009 till actual date of

payment. Such payment is to be made within eight

weeks from the date of communication of the certified

copy of this order to the concerned authorities.

The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

There will be no order as to costs.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if

applied for, be made available to the parties upon

compliance of the requisite formalities.

(Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter