Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 744 Cal
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2022
22.02.2022 (S/L-38) (Susanta) (Via Video Conference) C.O. 2995 of 2019 Sankari Dutta & Ors.
-Vs-
Joydeb Koley & Ors.
Mr. Dhananjay Banerjee, Ms. Oindrila Ghosh, ...... For the Petitioners.
Mr. Dhananjay Banerjee, learned advocate for
the petitioners, submits that his clients are not
willing to proceed with the present revisional
application.
C.O. 2995 of 2019 is, therefore, dismissed as not
pressed.
He, however, prays for a direction upon the
learned Trial Judge for disposal of his prayer for
sending the copy of the order to the prescribed
authority for correction of the record of rights of the
suit property.
The 1st Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior
Division), Chandernagore, District- Hooghly is
directed to communicate the judgment and order no.
44 dated February 18, 1992 passed in Misc. Case no.
10 of 1986 which was affirmed in Miscellaneous
Appeal No. 44 of 1992 by the 1st Court of Additional
District Judge, Hooghly to the prescribed authority
for correction of the record of rights of the suit plot in
terms of the judgment and order of preemption.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be supplied to the party subject to
compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Biswajit Basu, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!