Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 611 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2022
OD - 14
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)
ORIGINAL SIDE
ITA/648/2004
ASHOK VARDHAN KOTHARI
VS.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (CENTRAL) - II
BEFORE :
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
AND
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Date : February 22, 2022.
[Via Video Conference]
Appearance :
Mr. Ashok Bhowmik, Adv.
... for the respondent
The Court : None appears for the appellant.
We find from the order sheets of three earlier occasions, the order of
the Hon'ble Division Bench for adjourning by showing the case under the
caption "For Orders" (dated 10.03.2015) and under the caption "For
Judgment" (dated 30.03.2015 and 24.03.2015) and have observed this is to
show that there should be an intimation to do the appeal. But in spite of the
same, it appears that the case was not argued before the earlier Hon'ble
Division Bench. Today there is no representation for the appellant.
Therefore, it appears that the appellant is not interested to prosecute this
matter.
Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) RS/GH
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!