Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rashid Sekh vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 8427 Cal

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8427 Cal
Judgement Date : 16 December, 2022

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Rashid Sekh vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 16 December, 2022
Form No. J(2)

             IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                     Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
                             Appellate Side

Present:
The Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta


                        W.P.A. 27421 of 2022

                              Rashid Sekh
                                   Vs.
                     The State of West Bengal & Ors.

For the petitioner              Ms. Papiya Chattopadhyay
                                Mr. Md. Badruzzaman

For the State                        Mr. Sk. Md. Galib


Heard on             : 16.12.2022.

Judgment on          : 16.12.2022.



Jay Sengupta, J.

This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India praying for direction upon the respondent authorities for

allowing permission for holding a religious gathering on 20.12.2022 at

the Masjid compound or its surrounding area to be conducted by the

Baniakhari Waktia Masjid from 10 AM to 10 PM.

Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken

on record.

A fresh report filed on behalf of the State is also taken on

record.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits

as follows. The petitioner is the President of Baniakhari Waktia Masjid

Committee Religious Organization. The committee wants to hold a

religious jalsha at the masjid and its surrounding area on 20.12.2022

between 10 AM to 10 PM. The same would be done without hampering

public, health, morality or tranquility. This right of the petitioner is

guaranteed by Article 25 of the Constitution of India. Among others,

Janab Abbas Siddique (Alkureshi), an eminent Islamic scholar will

come. A representation was made to the police. But, permission has

not been granted as yet. A second venue nearby has been proposed in

the supplementary affidavit. A " No Objection" has also been taken

from the land owner.

Learned counsel for the State relies a report and submits as

follows. A few years ago, the same speaker namely, Janab Abbas

Siddique came to the venue and gave a speech, which hurt the

religious sentiments of specific sect of the community. This led to the

communal disharmony in the area. The State does not agree with the

second venue proposed by the petitioner either.

Every citizen has right to practice and preach his religion.

However, such right is subject to reasonable restrictions.

Simply because there are two different sects in a community

with opposing views and because one sect may not like the views of

the other, that other sect cannot be prevented from holding religious

discourses.

Although an allusion has been made to an earlier incident of

communal tension between the two sects involving speeches given by

the same speaker, no action seems to have been taken by the

respondent authorities over such incidents. There is no mention of

any criminal or other case in this regard in the reports. Even if one

accepts, for argument's sake, that such an incident did happen a few

years ago, the same cannot be a reason to stop the petitioner from

holding a religious discourse.

Therefore, the respondents are directed to grant permission to

the petitioner to hold the religious discourse at the second venue as

proposed by the petitioner. The same shall be conducted peacefully

and in accordance with law. There shall be no speech made by any of

the accused that is capable of inciting any kind of violence. There

should be no use of any abusive language. Subject to strict

compliance of the prevailing standards of morality and decency, the

petitioner shall conduct the 'jalsa'. Strict compliance should be made

of restrictions regarding use of sound equipments and the like. If any

other permission is required from Government Authority, the same

should be taken. The organizers would organize such event carefully

and with due caution .

The police shall keep a strict vigil at the place to avoid any

untoward incident and maintain peace. The police is directed to

deploy adequate number of personnel in the area at the relevant time.

With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.

Parties shall act on a server copy of this order, duly downloaded

from the official website of this Court and the petitioner shall be at

liberty to communicate a gist of this order

.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)

ssi

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter