Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5817 Cal
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2022
23. 08 . 2022
BP Sl. 16 CRR 2286 of 2021 Court no.42. With CRAN 1 of 2022
In the matter of: Sasthi Roy ...petitioner
Mr. Ranjan Kali Ms. Nabanita Dutta Mr. Suraj Bhattacharjee ..for the petitioner
Mr. Ranabir Roy Chowdhury Mr. Mainak Gupta ..for the State
Affidavit of service filed in court today be kept
with the record.
It appears on examination of affidavit of service
that in spite of service of notice, the private opposite
party has not entered appearance.
Mr. Ranabir Roy Chowdhury, learned advocate
represents the State of West Bengal.
It is pointed out by the learned advocate for the
petitioner that during the pendency of the instant
criminal revision a Co-ordinate Bench quashed
prosecution report submitted in connection with
N.G.R. No. 773 of 2021 by the Bidhannagar Police
Station under Section 107 read with Section 116 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure in WPA 12742 of 2021
vide order dated 11th February, 2022.
In view of quashment of N.G.R. No. 773 of 2021
in WPA 12742 of 2021, a proceeding under Section
108 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot exist.
Hence, the instant revision becomes infructuous.
Accordingly, the instant revision is disposed of
being infructuous and the interim order passed by
this court is vacated. The parties are at liberty to seek
for appropriate relief in the trial court in view of the
judgment passed in WPA 12742 of 2021 dated 11 th
February, 2022 in respect of the proceeding under
Section 108 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J. )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!