Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5152 Cal
Judgement Date : 8 August, 2022
Form J(1) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Present :
The Hon'ble Justice Bibek Chaudhuri
CRR 2319 of 2022
Rahul Jaiswal
Vs.
The State of West Bengal
Mr. Soumojit Das Mahapatra
Mr. A. A. Alamgir
Ms. Riya Das
Ms. Rabia Khatun
...for the petitioner
Md. Kutubuddin
...for the State
Item No.190ML
Heard & Judgment on: 08.08.2022
Bibek Chaudhuri, J.
The accused/petitioner has prayed for expeditious
disposal of NDPS Case No.8 of 2020 arising out of Serampore
Police Station Case No.52 of 2020 dated 11 th February, 2020
under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and
Psychotropic Substances Act presently pending before the
learned Special Judge under NDPS Act at Hooghly.
On perusal of the instant revision and considering the
nature of the relief claimed this Court is of the view that the
instant revision can be disposed of here and now with the
assistance of the learned advocate for the State.
Therefore, Md. Kutubuddin, learned advocate is requested to
assist this Court on behalf of the State respondent.
The appointment of Md. Kutubuddin be regularized by the
learned Legal Remembrancer, Government of West Bengal.
It is submitted by the learned advocate for the petitioner that
the accused was arrested in connection with the above mentioned
case by the police on 11 February, 2020 with an allegation that he
was found in possession of narcotic substances above the commercial
quantity. Police submitted charge sheet against the accused and the
trial Court framed charge against the accused on 24 th September,
2021. Subsequently, date for recording evidence was fixed on 13 th
January, 2022, thereafter on 12th May, 2022 and the next date of
hearing of the case is fixed on 19th November, 2022. On previous
dates prosecution failed to produce any witness for examination. The
accused is languishing in jail without any trial.
It is important to note that in a case instituted on police report
it is the duty of the prosecution to produce witnesses. However, it is
the consistent experience of the Court that the learned Public
Prosecutor in the Special Courts all over the State do not take any
positive step for production of the witnesses. There are seventeen
witnesses in the charge sheet. Not a single witness was produced by
the prosecution on the previous dates of trial.
Under such circumstances, the instant revision is disposed of
directing the trial Judge to instruct the Special Prosecutor to produce
at least three witnesses on 19 th November, 2022. Thereafter, the
learned trial Judge shall fix a schedule of examination of witnesses in
terms of the provision under Section 309 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure and take serious endeavour to examine all the witnesses
within six months from the date of communication of the order.
With the above direction the instant revision is disposed of.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!