Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5070 Cal
Judgement Date : 3 August, 2022
Form J(1) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Present :
The Hon'ble Justice Bibek Chaudhuri
C.R.R. 2538 of 2022
Anil Aggarwal
Vs.
The State of West Bengal& Anr.
For the petitioner : Mr. Manjit Singh, Adv.
For the respondents : Mr. Sandipan Ganguly, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Nikunj Barlia, Adv.
Mr. Rachit Lakmani, Adv.
Heard on : 03.08.2022
Judgment On : 03.08.2022.
Bibek Chaudhuri, J.
The learned Advocate for the petitioner is requested to file
fresh Vokalatnama which has already been executed by the petitioner
in the department.
It is submitted by Mr. Manjit Singh, learned Advocate for the
petitioner that the petitioner does not want to proceed with the
instant revision and the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the
same with liberty to file a fresh revision on the self-same cause of
action.
Prayer is considered and allowed.
The instant revision is disposed of being not pressed with
liberty to file a fresh revision, if any, on the self-same cause of action.
The certified copies of the impugned orders be handed over to
the learned Advocate on record on replacing of the said certified
copies by photostat copies of the same.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
Mithun De/ A.R. (Ct).
Sl No.158.
D/L.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!