Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5020 Cal
Judgement Date : 24 September, 2021
24.09.2021
ss
F.M.A. 546 of 2017
I.A. CAN 1 of 2021
( Via Video Conference )
Srihari Ghosh
Vs.
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & ors.
Mr. Ali Imam Shah
...For the Appellant/claimant
Mr. Sanjay Paul
... For the respondent No.1/Insurance Co.
The instant appeal is directed against the
judgment and award dated June 18, 2014 passed by the
learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, 5th
Court, Burdwan, Purba Bardhaman in MAC Case No. 41
of 2012/300 of 2012 in a claim under Section 166 of the
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for injury of Sri Hari Ghosh in
road accident occurred on 27.11.2011.
The claim was filed under Section 166 of the Motor
Vehicles Act. Learned Advocate for the appellant/claimant
submits that the learned Tribunal committed error in law
while not granting medical expenses which were proved
by evidence of P.W.3, Pratap Swain who was working at
Woodland Hospital, Kolkata and he submitted money
receipts and medical bills marked as exhibit 6 collectively
and marked as exhibit 7 collectively for a sum of
Rs.4,46,906/-.
Learned Advocate for the appellant submits that in
case of injury, medical expenditure should be granted
under the head of 'Medical Expenditure' but learned
Tribunal committed an error in law in not considering the
same under the head of medical expenditure.
Considering the judgement of Syed Sadiq Etc. Vs.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd., reported in 2014(1)
T.A.C. 369(SC) and the judgement of National Insurance
Company Ltd. Vs. Subhasis Manna & anr., reported in
2019(4) T.A.C. 95(Cal).
In reply, Mr. Sajay Paul, learned Advocate
appearing on behalf of the Insurance Company submits
that the award passed by the learned Tribunal is
absolutely just and proper and there is no scope of
interference and/or modification of award.
Mr. Paul further submits that the learned Tribunal
rightly refused to grant any compensation towards
medical expenses since the victim did not suffer any
permanent or temporary disability. It is also argued that
on the day of occurrence the victim was initially admitted
at Burdwan Medical College & Hospital wherefrom the
victim had been referred to S.S.K.M. Hospital or National
Medical College & Hospital for better treatment but the
victim or his family members chose to admit the victim at
Woodlands Hospital for luxurious treatment and spent
Rs.4,46,906/-. Accordingly, the insurance company
should not be held liable for such luxurious treatment.
After considering the submissions made by the
learned Counsel for the parties and the evidence of the
representative in Woodlands Hospital, I did not find any
gravity in the submissions of Mr. Paul, learned Counsel
for the insurance company as it is the right and choice of
the victim to get best treatment in any Nursing Home or
Hospital, either Government of private.
Accordingly, the impugned award is modified and
recalculated in the manner referred hereinafter :
Particulars Amount
Pain and suffering Rs.50,000/-
Loss of earning during period of
treatment Rs.2,000/-
Medical expenditure Rs.4,46,906/-
Total compensation Rs.4,98,906/-
Less : Deduction of award money Rs.52,000/-
Enhanced award Rs.4,46,906/-
Mr. Ali Imam Shah, learned Counsel appearing on
behalf of the appellant/claimant admits that his client
has already received the awarded sum of Rs.52,000/-
along with interest. Accordingly, the balance enhanced
sum of Rs.4,46,906/- would become payable to the
appellant/claimant by the insurance company together
with interest @ 6% p.a. on and from the date of filing of
the claim petition till actual payment within a period of
45 days from the date of receipt of the bank account
particulars of the claimant. Learned Advocate for the
appellant/claimant will forward the bank account details
of the claimant within a fortnight from date to the learned
Advocate for the Insurance Company.
It is made clear that the payment shall be made by
NEFT/RTGS.
With the aforesaid directions, the instant appeal is
disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
In view of the disposal of this appeal, connected
application, if any, is also disposed of.
L.C.R., if any, be returned back to the court below
forthwith.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of all
formalities, on priority basis.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!