Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Soumen Kumar Ghosh vs Union Of India & Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 4892 Cal

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4892 Cal
Judgement Date : 16 September, 2021

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Sri Soumen Kumar Ghosh vs Union Of India & Ors on 16 September, 2021
Form J(2)      IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
                         Appellate Side

Present :
The Hon'ble Justice Bibek Chaudhuri

                      WPA/22713/2005

                  Sri Soumen Kumar Ghosh
                          -Versus-
                    Union of India & Ors.

For the Petitioner                : None.

For the Union of India            : None.

Heard & Judgment on               : 16.09.2021.


Bibek Chaudhuri, J.-

     The petitioner has invoked constitutional writ jurisdiction of
this Court for deliberate inaction on the part of the respondent

authorities by not releasing and making payment of ex gratia to the petitioner due to his service in the respondents' office for the period between 21st February, 1966 to 5th June, 1974.

None appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, since the matter is pending from 2005 I have perused the petition along with the Annexures filed by the petitioner.

The petitioner was an employee of National Projects Construction Corporation Limited. He was posted at Matigara in

the district of Darjeeling till the date of his voluntary retirement on 29th July, 1994.

It is the grievance of the petitioner that even after unblemished and uninterrupted service for about 24 years the petitioner was not paid retiral ex gratia of Rs.89,250/-. He made representation one after another to his superiors. However, in reply, he was informed that papers relating to his service were not available in the office.

If the petitioner is entitled to ex gratia on voluntary retirement the respondent authority is legally bound to make such payment. This cannot be a ground that payment of ex gratia could not be made to the petitioner for want of necessary papers to be maintained in the office of the respondent authorities.

In view of such circumstances, the instant writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents, especially respondent nos. 2 and 5 to release ex gratia payment to the petitioner within two months from the date of this order, if at all the petitioner is entitled to such sum.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the learned Advocates for the parties on the usual undertakings.

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J. )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter