Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5827 Cal
Judgement Date : 24 November, 2021
2. FMAT 679 of 2018 24-11-2021 sg
Ct. 8 Smt. Mira Dey & Anr.
Versus Satinath Pal & Ors.
(Through Video Conference)
The appellants are not represented nor any accommodation
is prayed on behalf of the appellants.
The Additional Stamp Reporter in his report has made two
defects. One of the defects is that the certified copy of the decree
under challenge is bereft of the date of judgment of that Court. In
view of Order XX Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the
decree should bear that date on which the judgment was
pronounced.
In view thereof, the date of decree and the date of the
judgment should be the same. We take the date of decree as that of
the date of judgement and for this purpose the record may not be
required to send down for rectification. However, the other defect
is minor which may also be cured.
The matter is adjourned for one week.
In the event the said defect is not removed in the meantime
and the appellants are not represented on the adjourned date or
either, the appeal may be dismissed.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!