Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1441 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 17 November, 2021
OD-59
ITAT/228/2017
IA No.GA/1/2017 (Old No.GA/1997/2017)
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax)
ORIGINAL SIDE
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
TAX, CENTRAL-2, KOLKATA
-Versus-
M/s. HOOGHLY MILLS PROJECTS LIMITED
Appearance:
Mr. P. K. Bhowmick, Adv.
...for the appellant.
Mr. Asim Choudhury, Adv.
...for the respondent.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
-And-
The Hon'ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 17th November, 2021.
The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue under
Section 260A of the Income Tax Act (the 'Act' in brevity) is
directed against the order dated 6th January, 2017 passed by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, C-Bench, Kolkata (the 'Tribunal')
in ITA No.422/Kol/2014 for the assessment year 2006-07.
The revenue has framed the following substantial
questions of law for consideration :
"(a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "C"
Bench, Kolkata erred in law in dismissing the appeal filed by the Revenue on the sole ground that the revision order underlying the impugned CIT(A) order had already been cancelled by the tribunal without appreciating that an appeal had been filed by the Revenue before the Hon'ble High Court challenging the order cancelling such underlying revision order?
(b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "C" Bench, Kolkata erred in law by setting aside the impugned order merely on the grounds that the proceedings are infructuous, the Learned Tribunal failed to comprehend that in the event the income tax department succeeded before the High Court in ITAT No.153/2017 arising from the order dated 26th October, 2016 passed by the tribunal in ITA No.549/Kol/2011 in such circumstances the income tax department would face extreme prejudice to thereafter continue the proceedings against the respondents culminating in loss of the revenue to the exchequer?"
We have heard Mr. Bhowmick, learned counsel for the
appellant/revenue and Mr. Chowdhury, learned counsel for the
respondent/assessee.
The present appeal is connected to an appeal ITAT 153 of
2017 which has been dismissed by a judgment dated 17th November,
2021. The present appeal arises out of an order passed by the
Tribunal dismissing the revenue's appeal as having become
infructuous because of the order passed by the Tribunal which was
impugned before us in ITAT/153/2017.
Since the substantial issue has already been decided in
the said appeal (ITAT/153/2017), nothing survives for
consideration in this appeal.
Accordingly, the present appeal stands disposed of. All
connected applications stand closed.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
A/s./S.Das.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!