Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2279 Cal
Judgement Date : 22 March, 2021
22.03.2021
17
RP Ct.04
F AT 554 of 2019
+
IA No.CAN 2 of 2019 (Old No. CAN 11811 of 2019)
IA No.CAN 3 of 2019 (Old No. CAN 12379 of 2019)
IA No.CAN 4 of 2021
Shibamoy Singharoy
Versus
Payel Singharoy
Mr. Soumik Ganguli
Mr. Ovik Sengupta
Mr. Biplab Das
Mr. Arindam Paul
.... For husband/appellant
Mr. Rwitendra Banerjee
Mr. Shibasis Chatterjee
Mr. Sandip Kundu
.... For wife/respondent
CAN 12379 of 2019 is for alimony pendente lite. Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate appears on behalf of applicant- wife, who is respondent in the appeal. He demonstrates from his client's affidavit, her needs. He reiterates reliance on judgment dated 4th November, 2020 of Supreme Court in Rajnesh vs. Neha & Anr. (Criminal Appeal no.730 of 2020) on parameters for determining the quantum. Mr. Ganguli, learned advocate appears on behalf of appellant- husband and submits, his client's suit for divorce was dismissed, hence, the appeal. The unreasonable demand for alimony pendente lite on the one hand and on the other respondent-wife will not stay with his client. His client's appeal will be rendered without cause on respondent-wife coming to reside with his client in her matrimonial home. His client is willing to and wants her back. Mr. Banerjee responds that trial Court did not find his client to have been cruel to her husband in deserting him.
In view of position taken by the husband, we require Mr. Banerjee to obtain instruction on whether his client
will return to her matrimonial home. On adjourned date we would expect information that she has returned. Otherwise we intend to hear this application along with the appeal.
List on 5th April, 2021 as prayed by Mr. Banerjee.
(Arindam Sinha, J.)
(Suvra Ghosh, J)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!