Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2026 Cal
Judgement Date : 16 March, 2021
Dl. March 16,
9. 2021
Through Video Conference
M.A.T. 4 of 2021
Mr. Ashis Kumar Chowdhury,
Mr. Rajib Ghosh,
Mr. Deborupa Mukherjee,
...for the appellants.
Mr. Bhaskar Prosad Vaisya,
Mr. Suman Dey,
...for the State respondents.
The learned advocate appearing on behalf of the
appellants submits that following the affirmation of the order passed
by Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya in W.P.A. 9597 of 2019 on
December 11, 2019, the verification process have already started in
which the appellants have participated. In view thereof, the
appellants are not interested to proceed with the present application
for leave to appeal filed under CAN 2 of 2021.
Since the issues raised in this appeal have already been
decided by us on January 12, 2021 in M.A.T. 843 of 2020, the said
judgment governs the present appeal. In fact, while dismissing the
appeal being M.A.T. 843 of 2020 filed by some of the candidates
similarly placed with that of the present appellants, we have
observed that dismissal of the said appeal shall not prejudice the
rights of the appellants to participate in the verification process in
terms of the notification being no. 689/6723/CSSC/ESTT/2020
dated December 28, 2020. The nature of dispute involved in this
appeal is similar to that of M.A.T. 843 of 2020.
In view of the above and as prayed for on behalf of the
appellants, the application for leave to appeal stands dismissed for
non-prosecution.
Consequently, the memorandum of appeal and the
connected applications, if there be any, stand rejected.
There will be no order as to costs.
( Soumen Sen, J. )
dns ( Saugata Bhattacharyya, J. )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!