Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3515 Cal
Judgement Date : 30 June, 2021
AD. 88.
June 30, 2021.
MNS.
C. O. No. 1217 of 2021 (Via video conference)
Dilip Kumar Nath and others Vs.
Abdul Kazi Mondal and others
Mr. Surya Prasad Chattopadhyay, Mr. Arjun Samanta
... for the petitioners.
The petitioners have made out a prima
facie case as to the executing court having
refused to exercise jurisdiction vested in it by law
in rejecting the petitioners' second execution
case, filed pursuant to the liberty given by this
Court, at the inception on the ground of
maintainability merely on the finding that there
was no material to suggest that the decree-holder
had been dispossessed from the suit property by
the judgment-debtor subsequent to the passing of
the decree in Title Suit No. 36 of 2011, in
connection with which the execution case arose.
Since the decree passed in the said suit
categorically records the petitioners' possession
in respect of the disputed property at that
juncture, the executing court apparently ought to
have granted the relief as prayed for within the
purview of Order XXI Rule 32 of the Code of Civil
Procedure upon hearing the execution case on
merits, instead of rejecting it at the outset as not
maintainable.
This revisional application is, accordingly,
required to be heard on merits on the above
question.
The petitioners shall serve copies of the
revisional application on the opposite parties
indicating that the matter shall next be enlisted for
hearing on July 13, 2021, when the petitioners
shall file an affidavit-of-service.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!