Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3959 Cal
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2021
26.07.2021
Item No. 20
Ct. No. 04
PG
S.A. 298 of 2016
r
Mantu Bistu
Vs.
Tapan Kumar Bistu & Anr.
Mr. Apurba Krishna Das
Mr. S.B. Mukherjee...........for appellant
Appellant was plaintiff. The second appeal
has been preferred against judgment and decree dated
20th December, 2014 passed by the lower appellate Court,
affirming judgment and decree dated 31st March, 2012
dismissing the suit.
We have heard Mr. Das, learned advocate
appearing on behalf of appellant. We admit the appeal on
the following question of law:
"Where appreciation of evidence by both
Courts below points to Gangadhar Bistu having one
son known as Gosai Bistu and contents of the
khatian, being exhibit E and proclamation of sale
being exhibit 3, as could not be disputed by
respondents/defendants, exhibit E being
documentary evidence of Gangadhar Bistu having
son Gosaidas and exhibit 3 being documentary
evidence of Rakhal Bistu, being son of Gangadhar
Bistu, was it required for appellant to further prove he
is grandson of Gangadhar Bistu ?"
Call for records of the Courts below.
Appellant shall put in the requisites for preparation of
paper books upon receipt of the lower Court records
and service of notice of appeal.
Intimation by producing copy of this order
before the lower appellate Court below be made by
appellant.
Liberty to mention before the learned single
Judge for hearing, upon the appeal being made ready
in regard thereto.
(Arindam Sinha, J.)
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!