Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kalyani Biswas & Ors vs The National Insurance Co. Ltd. & ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 3941 Cal

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3941 Cal
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2021

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Kalyani Biswas & Ors vs The National Insurance Co. Ltd. & ... on 26 July, 2021
09 26.07.2021
Ct. 26                          (Via Video Conference)
SA/tbsr
                                  FMAT 1365 of 2017
                                            with
                                  I.A. No. CAN 1 OF 2021

                                      --------------

Kalyani Biswas & Ors.

-Vs.-

The National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

Mr. Rajdeep Bhattacharya ...For the Appellants/ Claimants.

Ms. Sucharita Paul ...For the Respondent/ Insurance Co.

I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2021

This is an application for condonation of delay in

filing the instant appeal.

On perusal of the pleadings, this Court is satisfied

that cause shown for delay in filing of the appeal is

sufficient and prayer for condonation of delay should be

allowed.

Accordingly, the application for condonation of

delay stands allowed.

CAN 1 of 2021 is disposed of.

F.M.A.T 1365 of 2017

By consent of the parties, the instant appeal is

treated as on day's list and is taken up for hearing.

The appeal is directed against the judgment and

award dated April 15, 2016 passed by the learned

Additional District Judge, 2nd Court at Barasat, North 24-

Parganas in Motor Accident Claim Case No. 767 of 2014.

The claim application has been filed under Section

166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants/claimants submit that the

appellants/claimants are entitled to 30% Future

Prospects of the deceased. The claimants/appellants

further submit that they are also entitled to a total sum

of Rs. 70,000/- under the collective heads of General

Damages in view of the law as it stands now after the

judgments delivered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

the case of National Insurance Company Limited Vs.

Pranay Sethi & Ors., reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680.

Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

respondent/Insurance Company argued that the correct

multiplier in the instant case should be 14 instead of 15,

as adopted by the learned court below, in view of the

judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of

Smt. Sarla Verma & Ors. vs. Delhi Transport

Corporation & Anr. reported in (2009) 6 SCC 121.

Accordingly, the impugned award is modified and

recalculated in the manner referred hereinafter :

Particulars                               Amount (Rs.)

Monthly Income                            Rs.18,084.00

Add 30% future prospect              (+) 5,425.00(rounded of)
                                        -------------
                                        23,509.00
                                               X12





                                     2,82,108.00
less:1/3rd  personal expenses       (-) 94,036.00
                                     ---------------
                                     1,88,072.00
Multiplier of 14 to be used                  (x) 14
                                    ----------------
                                    26,33,008.00

Collective heads of General Damages (+) 70,000.00

----------------

27,03,008.00 Less: Awarded amount (-)21,74,580.00

------------------

Differential Amount 5,28,428.00

The appellants/claimants acknowledge the receipt

of the entire amount of Rs. 21,74,580/- along with

interest. The balance amount of Rs. 5,28,428/- would

become payable to the appellants/claimants by the

respondent/Insurance Company together with interest

assessed at the rate of 6% per annum, from the date of

filing of the claim petition within a period of 45 days from

the date of receipt of the bank account particulars of the

appellants/claimants. Learned advocate for the

appellants/claimants will forward the bank account

details of the appellants/claimants within a fortnight

from date to the advocate for the respondent/Insurance

Company. The payment shall be made in the manner

and proportion decided by the court below.

With the aforesaid directions the instant appeal is

disposed of.

LCR, if any may be returned back to the Court

below.

In view of the disposal of this appeal, connected

application, if any, is also disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if

applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of all

formalities, on priority basis.

(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter