Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3856 Cal
Judgement Date : 19 July, 2021
19.07.2021.
Item no. 43.
Court No.13
ap
W.P.A. No. 10956 of 2021
(Through Video Conference)
Santosh Sarkar
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Himangshu Ghosh.
...For the petitioner.
Mr. Ansar Mondal,
Mr. Sougata Mitra.
...For the State.
Mr. Soumyadeep Biswas.
...For the private respondents.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that his
client is a senior citizen and desirous in selling out his
property and the private respondents are harassing
him in this regard.
Counsel for the private respondents submits
that in respect of title to the said property being Title
Suit No. 15 of 2018 was instituted before the learned
Civil Judge (Junior Division), Additional Court at
Krishnanagar which has since been decreed by a
judgment dated 20th June, 2019. The petitioner has
been permanently injuncted from entering into the suit
property or causing disturbance to the peaceful
possession of the private respondents.
In that view of the matter, this Court finds that
the writ petition is thoroughly misconceived, based on
suppression of material facts or misstatements thereof.
Hence, the instant writ petition shall stand
dismissed with costs which is assessed at Rs.5,100/-
(Rupees five thousand one hundred only) to be paid by
the petitioner to the respondents.
The plaint filed in Title Suit No. 15 of 2018 and
the judgment dated 20th June, 2019 are kept with the
record.
All parties are directed to act on a server copy
of this order on usual undertakings.
(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!