Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Akb vs Mst. Rahima Bibi & Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 3807 Cal

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3807 Cal
Judgement Date : 15 July, 2021

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Akb vs Mst. Rahima Bibi & Ors on 15 July, 2021
Ct.
No.   15.7                       F.M.A. 1433 of 2015
26    2021                                 With
                     IA No. CAN 1 of 2014 (Old No. CAN 9909 of 2014)
 5                           The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
akb                                         Vs.
                                 Mst. Rahima Bibi & Ors.
                                 ( Via Video Conference )

             Mr. Rajdeep Bhattacharya ...For the Appellant/Insurance Co.

             Mr. Jayanta Kumar Mondal
                                        ...For the Claimants/Respondents

The appeal of Insurance Company is directed

against the judgment and award dated June 16, 2014 passed

by learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, 3rd

Court, Barasat, North 24-Parganas in M.A.C. Case No. 26 of

2010 on a claim under section 163A of the Motor Vehicles

Act, 1988.

The ground raised by the insurance Company in

the appeal is that at the time of the accident the driver of the

offending vehicle was not holding a proper and effective

driving licence. Therefore, Insurance Company is not liable

to pay compensation in view of violation of the policy

conditions and the award should be satisfied by the owner of

the said vehicle.

As to the said ground, the award speaks that

representative of the motor vehicle department came and

deposed as DW 1 on behalf of Insurance Company and

exhibited a document issued by the Licensing Authority,

Barasat. From the said document it cannot be stated that the

licence issued in the name of the driver was a fake one. The

driver of the offending vehicle was never called to depose.

The tribunal in its award observed that in the light of the

above, since from the evidence of DW 1 it could not be

stated that the driving licence was fake, insurance company

would remain liable to pay compensation.

Learned counsel on behalf of the claimants

submits that the impugned order needs to be modified and

recalculated as per statute since the claimants are entitled to

just and proper compensation as per the statute.

Accordingly, the impugned award is modified and

recalculated as per statute and same is follows:

Particulars                                         Amount (Rs.)

Yearly income (Rs.3,000/-p.m.x12)                 36,000.00

Less: 1/3rd personal expenses                    - 12,000.00
                                                   24,000.00

Multiplier of 16 to be used                           (X) 16
                                                 3,84,000.00

Collective heads of General Damages             (+)4,500.00


                              Total              3,88,500.00

The total amount of Rs.3,88,500/- would become payable to the

claimants together with interest assessed @6% per annum on and from

the date of filing of the claim petition within a period of 45 days from

the date of receipt of the bank account particulars of the claimants.

Advocate for the claimants will forward the bank account details of the

said claimants within a fortnight from the date to Advocate for the

appellant insurance company. The payment shall be made in the

proportion decided by the Court below.

It is submitted by the Insurance Company that they have

deposited a sum of Rs.25,000/-with the Registrar General of this Court

in aid of this appeal.

Upon payment of the sum indicated hereinabove into the bank

accounts of the claimants/respondents, the insurance company shall be

entitled to claim refund of the aforesaid sum of Rs.25,000/- together

with any accrued interest from the Registrar General of this Court.

It will however be open to the insurance company to file a civil

suit against the owner of the offending vehicle for recovery of the

compensation paid or payable on the ground that it was the sole

obligation of the owner of offending vehicle to pay the compensation,

if it can prove its case that the driver of the offending vehicle did not

possess a valid driving licence at the time of accident.

In view of the above order, execution case, if any remains

stayed.

With the aforesaid directions the instant appeal is disposed of.

In view of the disposal of this appeal, connected applications

are also disposed of.

There will be no order as to costs.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be

given to the parties, upon compliance of all formalities, on priority

basis.

( Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter