Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3767 Cal
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2021
14.07.2021 Court No.30
Krishnendu Bail Granted CRM 11054 of 2020 (Via video Conference)
In Re:- An application for bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ;
And In Re : Sunny Hela Petitioner Mr. Manjit Singh, Mr. Gaganjyot Singh For the Petitioner Mr. Y.J.Dastoor, ld. A.S.G.
Mr. Phiroze Edulji Mr. Sagar Saha For the N.C.B.
The present application under Section 439 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the petitioner in
connection with NDPS Case No. N-127/2018 corresponding to
NCB Crime No.33/2018 under sections 20(b)(ii)(C)/29 of the
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
Mr. Singh, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner
submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. There
had been no recovery of any contraband substance from his
possession. Upon completion of investigation, charge-sheet has
also been filed and as such further detention of the petitioner,
who is in custody since 10th July, 2018, is not necessary.
He further submits that the petitioner has been roped in
only on the basis of statements of co-accused persons, as
recorded under section 67 of the NDPS Act, which are
inadmissible in law in view of the judgment delivered by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Tofan Singh - Vs- State of
Tamil Nadu.
Mr. Dastoor, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing
on behalf of the NCB opposes the petitioner's prayer and
submits that there are incriminating materials on record against
the petitioner.
In Tofan Singh (supra), it has, inter alia, been held that the
confessional statements under section 67 of the NDPS Act are
inadmissible in law. Save and except the confessional
statements, prima facie, there is no other substantive material
evidence against the petitioner.
In the present pandemic situation and rapid proliferation of
the virus, prayer for bail needs to be considered liberally unless
custodial interrogation is absolutely necessary [See the order
passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Re: Contagion of Covid-
19 Virus in Prisons].
In the said conspectus, we are of the opinion that further
detention of the petitioner is not warranted in the facts and
circumstances of the case, more so, when upon completion of
investigation charge sheet has also been submitted.
Accordingly, we allow this application and direct that the
petitioner, namely, Sunny Hela shall be released on bail upon
furnishing a bond of `20,000/- with two sureties of like amount
each, one of whom must be a local, to the satisfaction of the
learned Additional Sessions Judge, 6th Court (under NDPS Act)
Barasat, North 24-Parganas and on condition that he shall reside
at Baguihati and shall not leave the jurisdiction of Baguihati
Police Station save and except for attending the learned trial
court on all the dates, as fixed for hearing.
The petitioner shall also meet the Officer-in-Charge of
Baguihati Police Station once a fortnight until further orders.
It is made clear that in the event the petitioner fails to
comply with the aforesaid directions without any justifiable
cause, the learned trial court would be at liberty to cancel the
petitioner's bail without any further reference to this Court.
With the aforesaid observations, the application for bail,
being CRM No. 11054 of 2020, is disposed of.
All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly
downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Suvra Ghosh, J) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!