Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 89 Cal
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2021
07.01.2021
Item No.73
Court No.16
SG/AP
WPCT 63 of 2020
Gulsunara Begum
-Vs.-
Union of India & Ors.
(Through Video Conference)
M/s. Tarak Chandra Dutta,
Quazi Md. Hafizullah and
G.S. Kaderi, Advocates
... For the Petitioner,
present in court.
Mr. Anuran Samanta, Advocate
... For the Respondents,
present in court.
Challenge in the present petition has been made to
order dated 31.07.2020 passed by the Principal Chief
Personnel Officer, Eastern Railway, Kolkata, in
pursuance to direction issued by Central
Administrative Tribunal, Kolkata in OA No. 1646 of
2019 filed by the petitioner. It was in terms of the
directions issued in the aforesaid original application
filed by the petitioner that the impugned order has
been passed. Jurisdiction to raise the issue regarding
challenge to the aforesaid order passed in pursuance
to the direction issued by the Tribunal certainly lies
with the Tribunal and the petitioners cannot skip that
remedy and approach this court directly. Earlier
judgment of this Court dealing with the issue, which
allegedly has not been considered by the competent
authority while deciding the writ petition in terms of
the order passed by the Tribunal, cannot be a ground
to entertain the writ petition.
Hence, the present writ petition is dismissed as not
maintainable.
However, the same shall not debar the petitioner to
avail of his appropriate remedy to challenge the order
impugned in the present writ petition. Though, we
have not observed anything on merits of the
controversy, still it is made clear that nothing said
above shall be considered as expression of opinion on
merits of the controversy. The Tribunal, if called upon,
shall consider the matter on its own merits.
(Rajesh Bindal, J.)
(Aniruddha Roy, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!