Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 685 Cal
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2021
28.01.2021.
Item No. 11
S.A.T. 177 of 2018
with
C.A.N. 1 of 2019 (Old No. C.A.N. 2832 of 2019)
Sri Arabinda Maity and another
Vs.
Smt. Sita Moni Maity and others.
Mr. Abhik Sarkar,
Mr. Rivu Dutta.
... for the appellants.
The appeal is admitted on the following
substantial questions of law:
(1) Whether the court of appeal below was
justified in reversing the judgment and
decree of the trial court solely on the
ground that two persons possessing the
portion of the plots have not been
impleaded as party when such persons
purchased the undivided property from
the other co-sharers, namely, the
defendants?
(2) Whether the suit would fail for non-
impleadment of purchaser of a share in
the undivided property when his vendors
are already impleaded as party thereto
simply on the ground that they are
necessary party and not the proper
party?
(3) Whether the findings of fact recorded by
the trial court on the issue whether the
two persons, namely, Jhareswar Das and
Sk. Ukil, are not necessary party, can be
assailed and interfered simply on the
2
recitation of law on the subject without
embarking the journey on a factual
platform?
Re: C.A.N. 1 of 2019 (Old No. C.A.N. 2832 of 2019)
The plaintiffs/appellants are directed to serve
the copy of the instant application upon the
respondents by speed post and shall file affidavit of
service on the returnable date.
Let the instant application be listed after three weeks before the appropriate Bench.
ab (Harish Tandon, J.)
(Kausik Chanda, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!