Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 96 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2021
OD-1
ORDER SHEET
APOT/9/2021
WITH
AP/225/2020
IA No.GA/1/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL SIDE
(COMMERCIAL DIVISION)
QUIPPO INFRASTRUCTURE LTD
Versus
A2Z INFRASERVICES LTD AND ANR
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE I. P. MUKERJI
The Hon'ble JUSTICE SUBHASIS DASGUPTA
Date : 2nd February, 2021.
(Via Video Conference)
Appearance:
Mr. Swatarup Banerjee, Adv.
Mr. Sariful Haque, Adv.
Mr. Rajib Mullik, Adv.
Mr. Utpal Bose, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Hasnuhana Chakraborty, Adv.
Ms. N. Chatterjee, Adv.
The Court: Prima facie, we are of the opinion that there is no infirmity in the
judgment and order dated 21st January, 2021.
The subject matter is a works contract. There is a principal contract between
the first respondent and South Delhi Municipal Corporation. There is also a sub-
contract between the said respondent and the appellant petitioner. The sub-contract
was entered into under certain terms and conditions. The material one for the
purpose of this appeal is maintenance of an escrow account by the respondent no.1.
Monies received by the said respondent from South Delhi Municipal Corporation
would be deposited in that account under certain terms and conditions under which
the amount payable under the sub-contract to the appellant/petititioner would be
paid from that account.
The dispute between the parties is with regard to such payments. The
agreement was terminated on 28th May, 2020.
Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate for the appellant petitioner, submits that this
court should enforce the obligation of the first respondent to deposit all sums
received by them from South Delhi Municipal Corporation, into that account.
In our opinion, this would involve the court directing at the interim stage for
specific performance of the agreement and also levying an attachment before
judgment, as rightly pointed out by Mr. Utpal Bose, learned senior advocate for the
first respondent.
Prima facie, in a case of a work contract there is no scope of specific
performance of the agreement. No such case for attachment has been made out at
this stage.
We admit the appeal but refrain from passing an interim order.
As the respondents are represented by learned counsel, issuance and filing of
the notice of appeal are dispensed with.
We expedite hearing of the appeal.
Let informal paper books be filed by learned advocate-on-record for the
appellant by 12th February, 2021, serving a copy thereof upon the advocate-on-
record for the respondents at least seven days before the date of hearing of the
appeal.
We are told that a learned arbitrator has been agreed upon by the parties. We
observe that the resolution of the dispute between the parties can be done by
expeditious conduct and conclusion of the arbitral proceedings before the learned
arbitrator. We make it clear that the arbitral tribunal will be free to proceed despite
pendency of the appeal.
List the appeal for hearing on 23rd February, 2021.
The stay application (IA No.GA/1/2021) is, accordingly, disposed of. The
allegation contained therein are deemed not to be admitted.
(I. P. MUKERJI, J.)
(SUBHASIS DASGUPTA, J.) cs.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!