Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 159 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2021
OD-3
ORDER SHEET
APOT 21 of 2021
With
CS No. 190 of 2019
IA No. GA 1 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
ORIGINAL SIDE
SNEHLATA GUPTA AND ORS.
VERSUS
GOPAL KUMAR GUPTA
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE I. P. MUKERJI
AND
The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN
Date : 18th February, 2021.
(Via Video Conference)
Appearance:
Mr. Surajit Nath Mitra, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Arik Banerje, Adv.
Mr. Ayan Dutta, Adv.
Mr. Rajib Mullick, Adv.
Mr. Utpal Bose, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Hashnuhana Chakraborty, Adv.
Mr. Debjyoti Manna, Adv.
Mr. Sutanu Karmakar, Adv.
The Court : This appeal from the judgment and order dated 5th February,
2021 made by a learned single judge of this court appointing a receiver for the
purpose of making an inventory of the occupiers and ascertaining the occupation
charges paid by them, is formally admitted.
Mr. Surajit Nath Mitra, learned senior advocate appearing for the appellants
contends that it is undisputed that for a very long time his client is managing the
property in question which has several occupants. In an earlier suit, CS No. 130 of
2019, which is pending for enforcement of an agreement of partition between the
parties, this court on 20th August, 2019 had directed the parties to maintain status
quo with regard to, inter alia, the subject property situated on Canning Street. He
says that if the receiver enters the property, it would have a prejudicial effect on the
business of his clients and his clients' relationship with the occupiers.
2
Mr. Utpal Bose, learned senior advocate appearing for the respondent,
submits that if the receiver makes the inventory as directed, it would cause no
prejudice to the appellants, but will assist the court in determining the number of
occupiers, the rent paid, etc.
On consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties,
we find that the matter is returnable on 26th February, 2021 before the learned
single judge to receive the report of the receiver and for passing further orders.
At this stage, we direct Mr. Mitra's advocate on record to furnish a list of
occupiers and the rent payable by each of them to Mr. Bose's advocate on record, by
22nd February, 2021. Thereupon, on 24th February, 2021, both the learned
advocates shall visit the property in question informally where this list can be cross-
checked.
This in our opinion would cause prejudice to neither the appellants nor the
respondent.
The result of this exercise shall be reported to the learned single judge when
the matter is taken up next. At that point of time it would be open to the learned
single judge to direct formal visit, inspection and inventory of the said property and
preparation of a list of occupants by the appointed receiver.
The interim application may be considered by the learned single judge subject
to his convenience on the said returnable date i.e. 26th February, 2021.
With the above modification to the order of the learned single judge dated 5th
February, 2021, we dispose of this short appeal, dispensing with all formalities.
The connected application (IA No. GA 1 of 2021) is also disposed of.
(I. P. MUKERJI, J.)
(MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
cs.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!