Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri Bishnu Pada Karmakar vs Karunamoy Das (Deceased) ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 1444 Cal

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1444 Cal
Judgement Date : 12 February, 2021

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Shri Bishnu Pada Karmakar vs Karunamoy Das (Deceased) ... on 12 February, 2021

12.02.2021 Ct. No.9 S/L No.1 KS S.A. 304 of 1992 With IA No.CAN 1 of 2016 (Old No.CAN 523 of 2016) (Not Found)

Shri Bishnu Pada Karmakar

-Vs.-

Karunamoy Das (deceased) represented by Smt. Pateswari Dasi & Anr.

(Via Video Conference)

Mr. Saptarshi Kumar Kundu .....For the Appellant

Mr. Saptarshi Kumar Kundu, learned advocate, High

Court at Calcutta, Bar Association No.2 files Vakalatnama and

submits for acceptance of the same on the contention that he

has instruction from his client namely, Shri Bishnu Pada

Karmakar to withdraw the second appeal.

Written instruction and Vakalatnama filed in Court be

taken on record.

It would appear that the present appellant/plaintiff had

instituted a suit for specific performance of contract valued at

Rs.14,000/- by payment of earnest money of Rs.4,000/- out of the

total consideration of Rs.14,000/- the suit being, Title Suit

No.170 of 1980 was decreed against the defendants directing

them to execute the registered Sale of Deed in favour of the

plaintiff by the judgment delivered on 25.06.1985 and decree

drawn up thereon 03.07.1985. The judgment and the decree

was appealed against in Title Appeal No.216 of 1985 by the

defendant of the suit. The Appeal Court allowed the appeal on

contest setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the

Trial Court vide judgment dated 18.09.1986. The said appellate

judgment and the decree is in appeal before this Court pending

for a considerable period of time without any proper steps into

the appeal.

At this stage, learned Advocate for appellant has filed

written instruction dated 05.02.2021 of Bishnu Pada Karmakar

for non-prosecution of the appeal.

In view of the written instruction and upon hearing Mr.

Saptarshi Kumar Kundu, advocate the second appeal being, S.A.

No.304 of 1992 be dismissed for non-prosecution.

There will be no order as to costs.

L.C.R., if any, be sent down to the learned Court below.

(Shivakant Prasad, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter