Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1440 Cal
Judgement Date : 12 February, 2021
28.
12.02.2021
mb
In the High Court at Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
W.P.A. No. 2504 of 2021
(Via Video Conference)
Aroni Tubes Pvt. Ltd.
-Vs.-
West Bengal Agro Industries
Corporation Limited & Ors.
Mr. Ayan Banerjee,
Ms. Debasree Dhamali,
...for the petitioner
Mr. Joydip Kar,
Ms. Sarmila Das
...for the respondent-authorities
Mr. Debdeep Sinha, learned advocate,
submits that his client seeks intervention in the
writ petition, being the successful bidder in the
tender-in-question. However, learned counsel for
the writ petitioner submits that the work order
was issued in the morning of February 08, 2021,
when the matter was taken up for hearing and, as
such, the client of Mr. Debdeep Sinha was not
impleaded.
There is substance in the contention of the
writ petitioner since, in view of the work order
having been issued by the respondents
subsequent to the filing of the writ petition,
knowing fully well about the pendency of the writ
petition, the issuance of work order to the
proposed intervenor shall abide by the result of
the writ petition and the proposed intervenor
shall be bound by the order passed in the writ
petition. The interests of the intervenor are
sufficiently protected by the respondent-
authorities, who shall have to justify their own
actions.
That apart, such prayer for intervention at
this belated stage, when the writ petition itself
has come up for hearing, ought not to be
entertained on the ground of such delay as well.
Accordingly, the prayer for intervention is
refused.
The writ petition is taken up for hearing.
Written notes of argument filed by the
parties be kept on record.
Hearing concluded. Judgment reserved.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!