Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1424 Cal
Judgement Date : 12 February, 2021
267 12.02.2021 WPA 3783 of 2021
Dd
Ct.
15
Anil Kumar Mandal
Vs
The State West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Goutam Kumar Maity ... for the Petitioner
Ms. Mita Biswas ... ..For the State
Affidavit of service filed in court today is kept with
the record. The petitioner was an Assistant Teacher of a Primary
School who retired on 30.04.2009. The first pension payment order
was issued on 11.08.2009 under the ROPA Rules, 2009, there was
revision of the pensionary and gratuity amount payable to the
petitioner. The revised pension payment order was issued on
04.07.2013 and the revised gratuity and arrear pension amount was
disbursed on 13.08.2013 in terms of ROPA, 2009. The petitioner
claims interest on delayed payment of the revised gratuity and arrear
pension amount.
There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ
petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating that there is
no statutory period of limitation and neither parties have suffered
due to this delay. It is the submission of the petitioner that
accordingly the petition should be allowed. The petitioner relies
upon an order in W.P. 17557 (W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha
vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.) wherein a coordinate Bench had
relied upon the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Union of
India vs. Tarmen Singh, reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on the issue
2
of limitation relating to payment or refixation of pay or pension
wherein the Apex Court had held that relief may be granted in spite
of delay as it does not affect the rights of the third party.
In view of the above and after hearing the learned
Counsel for the parties, I direct the Director of Pension, Provident
Fund and Group Insurance, Government of West Bengal as also the
concerned Treasury Officer to pay interest to the petitioner @ 8%
per annum on the revised gratuity and arrear pension amount
calculated on and from 1.06.2009 till the date of actual payment.
Such payment is to be made within a period of eight weeks from the
date of communication of this order.
This writ petition is, thus, disposed of.
Since, no affidavit-in-opposition has been called for,
the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to have not been
admitted by the respondents.
There will be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be given to the parties, on priority basis.
(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!