Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1025 Cal
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2021
235 05.02.2021
Sc
WPA 2508 OF 2021
(Through Video Conference)
--------
Subodh Chandra Maiti Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Goutam Kumar Maity ... for the Petitioner
Ms. Anima Das Chakraborty ... for the State.
Affidavit of service filed in court today is kept with the record.
The petitioner was an Assistant Teacher of a Primary School who retired on 30.09.1998. The first pension payment order was issued on 05.01.2000. Under the ROPA Rules, 2009, there was revision of the pensionary and gratuity amount payable to the petitioner. The revised pension payment order was issued on 25.03.2002 and the revised gratuity and arrear pension amount was disbursed on 11.08.2003 in terms of ROPA, 2009. The petitioner claims interest on delayed payment of the revised gratuity and revised arrear pension amount.
There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating that there is no statutory period of limitation and neither parties have suffered due to this delay. It is the submission of the petitioner that accordingly the petition should be allowed. The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P. 17557 (W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.) wherein a co- ordinate Bench had relied upon the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Union of India vs. Tarsem
Singh, reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on the issue of limitation relating to payment or refixation of pay or pension wherein the Apex Court had held that relief may be granted in spite of delay as it does not affect the rights of the third party.
In view of the above and after hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, I direct the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of West Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to pay interest to the petitioner @ 8% per annum on the revised gratuity and revised arrear pension amount calculated on and from 1.6.2009 till the date of actual payment.
Such payment is to be made within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.
This writ petition is, thus, disposed of. Since, no affidavit-in-opposition has been called for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to have not been admitted by the respondents.
There will be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, on priority basis.
(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!