Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4433 Cal
Judgement Date : 27 August, 2021
27.08.2021
Mithun Ct.No.09.
CRR/2303/2019
(Via Video Conference)
Subham Roy Choudhury Vs.
Sreejoyee Chakraborty
Mr.Ajoy Roy Chowdhury, Adv.
...for the Petitioner.
It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the petitioner
that in the order dated 12 th April, 2021, there is typographical
error in Paragraph 2 of the said judgment where it is written, "it
is not disputed by the petitioner that the opposite party is his
legally married wife .....". According to the learned Advocate for
the petitioner the word 'not' inadvertently recorded and it
should be omitted.
I have heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner. The
case of the petitioner is that the marriage between the petitioner
with his wife was solemnized and subsequent to marriage he
came to know that she was sulfuring from advance stage of
cancer for 9 years prior to her marriage. Entire fact was
recorded in the order dated 12 th April, 2021. Solemnization of
marriage was not disputed. Therefore, in Paragraph 2 of the
judgment is found to be correctly recorded and no portion of the
said order amounts to clerical or ministerial error. Therefore,
the prayer of the petitioner is rejected.
( Bibek Chaudhuri, J. )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!