Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anup Kumar Pusti @ Naba & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal
2021 Latest Caselaw 2756 Cal

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2756 Cal
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2021

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Anup Kumar Pusti @ Naba & Ors vs The State Of West Bengal on 12 April, 2021
12.04.2021                                      CRM 787 of 2021

Court No.28
                                             (Via Video Conference)
 Item 290

In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Joypur Police Station Case No. 102 of 2020 dated sg 27.08.2020 under Sections 341/325/308/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Anup Kumar Pusti @ Naba & Ors.

Versus The State of West Bengal Allowed

Mr. Sandip Chakraborty, Adv.

...for the State.

We find that an order dated 6th January, 2021 passed by the learned Sessions

Judge, Howrah has been referred to an enclosure along with an application under

Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The learned Sessions Judge has been pleased to observe that "when a

warrant is pending against any accused, no relief of anticipatory bail can be granted"

and the same has been quoted from a judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported

in 2012(8) SCC 730 in the matter of Lavesh vs. State (Nct of Delhi). We are afraid

that paragraph 12 of the said judgment refers to only when a person has been

declared as a absconder pursuant to an order of proclamation being issued and the

same is not applicable when a warrant of arrest has been issued after submission of

charge-sheet. The said observation and the conclusion arrived at by the learned

Session Court is unsustainable in law and should be amenable accordingly in future.

So far as the merits of the present case is concerned, we have invited the learned

Advocate for the State to draw our attention regarding injuries which are appearing

in the report which is enclosed in the case diary.

On appreciation of the same and the fact that charge-sheet has already been

submitted, we are of the opinion that custodial detention of the petitioners may not

be warranted. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be

released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

each, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the

satisfaction of the arresting officer subject to the condition laid down under Section

438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners shall meet with the

Officer-in-Charge of Joypur Police Station once a week until further orders on and

from 20th April, 2021.

With the aforesaid observation, the prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed.

CRM 787 of 2021 is, thus, disposed of.

All parties shall act on the server copy of the order.

   (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)                                       (Soumen Sen, J.)
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter