Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2698 Cal
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2021
S/L 78
08.4.2021
Court No. 26
SD
WPA 2943 of 2021
(Via Video Conference)
Bhagirath Panda
Vs.
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Banshi Badan Maity
... for the Petitioner.
Affidavit of service filed in court today is kept with the
record.
The petitioner was a Head Teacher of a High School
who retired on 31.1.2011. The petitioner had completed all
his pension related formalities prior to his retirement.
However, the concerned authorities delayed and released
arrear pension amount on 01.9.2012. The petitioner herein
seeks interest to be paid on the arrear pension amount for
the interim period of delay in receipt of the arrear pension
amount.
There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ
petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating that
there is no statutory period of limitation and neither parties
have suffered due to this delay. It is the submission of the
petitioner that accordingly the petition should be allowed.
The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P. 17557 (W) of 2017
(Narayan Chandra Saha vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.)
wherein a co-ordinate Bench had relied upon the Supreme
Court judgment in the case of Union of India vs. Tarsem
2
Singh, reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on the issue of
limitation relating to payment or refixation of pay or pension
wherein the Apex Court had held that relief may be granted
in spite of delay as it does not affect the rights of the third
party.
In view of the above and after hearing the learned
Counsel for the parties, I direct the Director of Pension,
Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of West
Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to pay interest
to the petitioner @ 8% per annum on the arrear pension
amount calculated from 01.3.2011 till the date of actual
payment. Such payment is to be made within a period of
eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.
With these observations, the writ petition is disposed
of.
Since, no affidavit-in-opposition has been called for,
the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to
have not been admitted by the respondents.
There will be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be given to the parties, on priority basis.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!