26 2021 Rajeda Khatun vs 55 The State Of West Bengal & Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 2650 Cal

Ct.
No.   08.04                       W.P.A. 3706 of 2021
26    2021                               Rajeda Khatun
                                               Vs.
155                              The State of West Bengal & Ors.
akb

              Mr. Banshi Badan Maity       ...For the Petitioner


              1.           Affidavit of service filed in court today is kept
              with the record.

              2.           The petitioner's husband was an 'Assistant
              Teacher' of a High School, who retired on 31.01.2006 and
              died on 12.12.2019. The first pension payment order was
              issued on 19.01.2006. Under the ROPA Rules, 2009 there
              was revision of the pensionary and gratuity amount payable
              to the petitioner. The revised pension payment order was
              issued on 24.7.2012 and the revised arrear pension amount
              was disbursed on 13.9.2012 in terms of ROPA, 2009. The
              petitioner claims interest on delayed payment of the revised
              arrear pension amount.

              3.           I have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner
              and I have considered the orders passed by this Court in
              similar facts. It is settled law that retired employee is entitled
              to some amount of interest on delayed payment of arrear
              pension and gratuity.

              4.           There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ
              petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating that
              there is no statutory period of limitation and neither parties
              have suffered due to this delay. It is the submission of the
              petitioner that accordingly the petition should be allowed.

              5.           The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P.
              17557 (W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha vs. State of West
              Bengal & Ors.) wherein a co-ordinate Bench had relied upon
                           2




the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Union of India
vs. Tarsem Singh, reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on the issue
of limitation relating to payment or refixation of pay or
pension wherein the Apex Court had held that relief may be
granted in spite of delay as it does not affect the rights of the
third party.

6.             In view of the above and after hearing the
learned Counsel for the parties, I direct the Director of
Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government
of West Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to pay
interest to the petitioner @ 8% per annum on the revised
arrear pension amount calculated on and from 01.6.2009 till
the date of actual payment. Such payment is to be made
within a period of eight weeks from the date of
communication of this order.

7.             With these observations, the writ petition is
disposed of.

8.             Since, no affidavit-in-opposition has been called
for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to
have not been admitted by the respondents.

9. There will be no order as to costs.

10. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, on priority basis.

( Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)