Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 5160 Bom
Judgement Date : 15 May, 2026
Digitally signed
by MULEY
SHUBHAM
MULEY PRAVINRAO
SHUBHAM Date:
PRAVINRAO 2026.05.15
21:59:49
+0530 1 28-WPL-17370-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.17370 OF 2026
Bhupesh Vaman Dave alias Bhupendra Vaman Dave ...Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Divisional Engineer (estt./s)
Western Railway & Ors. ...Respondents
-----------------
Mr. Yatin Malvankar for the Petitioner.
Mr. Dashrath A. Dube a/w Rupesh Dubey and Sachidanand Singh for
Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
Smt. Vrushali Kabre, AGP for State.
-----------------
CORAM : ADVAIT M. SETHNA AND
SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 15 MAY, 2026 (VACATION COURT)
P.C.:-
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Issue Notice, returnable on 19
June 2026. The Respondents seek liberty to file Affidavit-in-Reply to the
Petition. Such Affidavit-in-Reply be filed on or before 11 June 2026.
2. We have heard the rival submissions. It prima facie appears that the
structure i.e. one of the tenements which is the subject matter of the
present proceedings is located on a private property which belongs to a
Trust i.e. Respondent No.7.
3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has brought to our notice the
order dated 2 September 2006 passed by the Small Causes Court in RAD
Suit No.5441 of 1976 where the Plaintiff i.e. father of the Petitioner is
2 28-WPL-17370-2026.doc
declared tenant in respect of three rooms in the compound of Shri Shankar
Mandir situated at Dadar on the North side of the public road leading from
Mumbai to Mahim. The learned counsel for the Petitioner has submitted
that the present tenement would be a part of one of the said three rooms
which form a part of the Decree of Small Causes Court dated 2 September
2006.
4. Mr. Dube, learned counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 is vehemently
opposing any grant of ad-interim relief. He has placed on record a copy of
an order passed under Public Premises Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants
Act, 1971. The said order appears to have been passed in respect of the
brother of the Petitioner.
5. The Petitioner submits that he has been apprised of such order for the
first time. The Petitioner is not even party to such order.
6. In light of all of the above, until the reply is filed a prima facie case
for the grant of ad-interim relief is made out.
7. In the meantime, we direct that no coercive steps much less
demolition of the said tenement would be undertaken until the next date
and/or until further orders are passed in these proceedings.
8. Stand over to 19 June 2026.
9. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.
[SANDESH D. PATIL, J.] [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.]
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!