Sunday, 31, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rahul Uday Shrivastav vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors
2026 Latest Caselaw 5093 Bom

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 5093 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Rahul Uday Shrivastav vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 14 May, 2026

     2026:BHC-AS:22519-DB
           Digitally signed                                                                  39-WP-2459-2026 (CR).doc
           by PALLAVI
           MAHENDRA
PALLAVI    WARGAONKAR
MAHENDRA
WARGAONKAR Date:
           2026.05.14
           14:50:07
           +0530

                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                                  CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2459 OF 2026

                               Rahul Uday Shrivastav                               ...Petitioner
                                     Versus
                               The State of Maharashtra And Ors.                   ...Respondents
                                                              __________
                               Ms. Sayli Wani for the Petitioner.
                               Ms. Supriya Kak, APP for State.
                               Mr. R. G. Gujar, PSI, Malad Police Station is present.
                                                                  __________

                                                              CORAM : ADVAIT M. SETHNA &
                                                                      SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 14 MAY 2026 (VACATION COURT)

P.C.:

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The learned AGP Ms. Kak on instructions states that the

statements of the Petitioner and Detenue has been recorded on 13

May 2026 before Charkop Police Station, Kandivali. It is stated on

instructions that both the parties have agreed to reside together

and have no complaints against each other.

3. In view thereof, the learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks

liberty to withdraw this Petition. Liberty granted.

4. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

[SANDESH D. PATIL, J] [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.]

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter