Monday, 01, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ankit Pushpatraj Sakariya vs Arka Fincap Limited
2026 Latest Caselaw 5090 Bom

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 5090 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Ankit Pushpatraj Sakariya vs Arka Fincap Limited on 14 May, 2026

                                                                  3-WP(L)-17030-2026 (OS).doc



                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                          ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION


                           WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 17030 OF 2026

        Ankit Pushpatraj Sakariya                                       ...Petitioner
              Versus
        Arka Fincap Limited                                             ...Respondent
                                           __________

        Mr. Siddharth Samantray, Mr. Pratik Kothari, Mr. Harsh Agarwal, i/b Pratik
        Kothari, for the Petitioner.
        Mr. Dipesh Siraya, AGP, for the Respondent No. 3 - State.
        Mr. Avdhoot Prabhu, i/b Lex Services for Respondent No. 2.
        Mr. Padmakar S. Garad, for Respondent No. 1.
                                           __________

                                       CORAM : ADVAIT M. SETHNA &
                                               SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 14 MAY 2026 (VACATION COURT)

P.C.:

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Mr. Samantray, learned

counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Petitioner has been a

bona fide Prospective Purchaser of the subject property.

2. A specific query was put to the learned counsel for the Respondent

- Bank as to whether the amount of Rs. 90 lakhs had been forfeited by the

said bank. Upon instructions, learned counsel for the Respondent Bank

now states that the said amount has not been forfeited.

3. In the given factual matrix, we deem it appropriate to direct the

Respondent - Bank to refrain from dealing with the said amount, in any

3-WP(L)-17030-2026 (OS).doc

manner, until the next date of hearing of this Petition.

4. Needless to state, the DRT shall not be influenced by the order

passed today, and the proceedings sub judice before it, may continue

independently on their own merits and in accordance with law.

5. List the proceedings on 10th June 2026.

[SANDESH D. PATIL, J] [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.]

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter