Monday, 01, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Paras Shripalkumar Shah vs State Of Maharashtra
2026 Latest Caselaw 5054 Bom

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 5054 Bom
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Paras Shripalkumar Shah vs State Of Maharashtra on 14 May, 2026

2026:BHC-AS:22548

                                                               3-IA-1633-2026 IN BA-2015-2025.doc




                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                           INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1633 OF 2026
                                            IN
                             BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2015 OF 2025
               Paras Shripalkumar Shah                ... Applicant
                            Versus
               The State of Maharashtra                          ... Respondent
                                        --------------------
               Mr. Vishal Krishna a/w Mr. Shreyash Shirke i/b Law Care, for the
               Applicant.

               Ms. Rashmi S. Tendulkar, A.P.P., for the Respondent-State.

               Mr. B. B. Tiwari a/w Mr. Viral Rathod, Ms. Shivani Shinde i/b Law
               Origin, for the Intervenor.

               Mr. Suryakant Doke, Police Sub Inspector, Borivali Police Station.
                                          --------------------
                                         CORAM : SANDESH D. PATIL, J.

                                               DATE    : 14 th MAY, 2026.
                                               (VACATION COURT)
               P.C. :

               1.        The present Application is filed by the Applicant inter alia

               praying for enlarging the Applicant on interim bail for a period of 30

               days in connection with C.R. No.441 of 2026 dated 13 th March, 2026

               registered with Borivali Police Station for offence committed under



               Manisha                                                                           1/7




                ::: Uploaded on - 14/05/2026                ::: Downloaded on - 14/05/2026 20:57:29 :::
                                                   3-IA-1633-2026 IN BA-2015-2025.doc




Sections 125(b), 115(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023

(BNS).



2.        Heard learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties.



3.        At the outset, Mr. Vishal Krishna, learned Counsel for the

Applicant seeks leave to add original Complainant/ victim as party

Respondent No.2 to the application. Leave granted. Amendment to be

carried out forthwith.



4.        Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant submits that the

F.I.R. is registered against the present Applicant for having assaulted

the complainant. He submits that the main Bail Application is pending.

He further submits that the Applicant is in custody since 23 rd March,

2026. He submitted that, in the interregnum the twin daughters of the

Applicant had appeared for JEE (Mains), 2026 exam where they have

obtained 99.89% and 99.68%. He submits that they will be appearing

for JEE (Advanced), 2026 exam. They have also registered themselves



Manisha                                                                             2/7




 ::: Uploaded on - 14/05/2026                  ::: Downloaded on - 14/05/2026 20:57:29 :::
                                                3-IA-1633-2026 IN BA-2015-2025.doc




for BITSAT, 2026 exam, an entrance exam of BITS Pilani, which is

scheduled between 24th May, 2026 to 26th May, 2026. He submits that

this is the time when the twin daughters will have to take a decision of

their career, the twin daughters have got brilliant academic record and

it is at this time, the guidance of their father is necessary for the

purpose of assisting them monetary wise as well as for other guidance.

He submits that the Applicant has got a good case on merits, in case

the Applicant is not granted bail, then the innocent twin daughters

who have got brilliant academic record would suffer.



5.        Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.2-victim

submits that the Applicant has committed a very grievous offence. He

submits that the victim has lost his eyesight and is hospitalized since

many months and that the condition of the victim is quite precarious.

He states that the Applicant may not be shown any leniency in as much

as he has committed a gruesome offence. He submits that the present

Application is just an attempt to get out of the jail. He submits that

there is no merit in the Application and the same deserves to be


Manisha                                                                          3/7




 ::: Uploaded on - 14/05/2026               ::: Downloaded on - 14/05/2026 20:57:29 :::
                                                   3-IA-1633-2026 IN BA-2015-2025.doc




rejected.



6.        Learned A.P.P. on the other hand submits that the offence is

serious in nature. She has relied upon the statement of the eye-

witnesses. Learned A.P.P. submits that in case this Court comes to the

conclusion that the Applicant is to be granted interim bail then strict

conditions be imposed.



7.        Having heard both the parties at length, I am of the opinion that

the twin daughters of the Applicant have passed the JEE (Mains), 2026

exam. The twin daughters who are at a crucial juncture of their

academic career, certainly require guidance from their father who is

also an engineer. At this time, the twin daughters would also require

financial assistance. Taking into consideration the uncontroverted

submission of the Applicant that the twin daughters have secured

99.89% and 99.68% in their JEE (Mains), 2026 exam, they surely

have got brilliant career and therefore their career should not be

hampered because of absence of their father.


Manisha                                                                             4/7




 ::: Uploaded on - 14/05/2026                  ::: Downloaded on - 14/05/2026 20:57:29 :::
                                                        3-IA-1633-2026 IN BA-2015-2025.doc




8.        Although I am inclined to release the Applicant on interim bail

for sometime, I however, do not agree with the prayer of the Applicant

that he be released on interim bail for one month. In this premise, the

following Order will serve the ends of justice:

                                            ORDER

(i) The Applicant-Paras Shripalkumar Shah be

released on interim bail upon furnishing P.R. Bond of

Rs.20,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount,

before the concerned trial Court, for a period of 16 th May,

2026 to 26th May, 2026 (both dates inclusive);

(ii) Till the sureties are submitted, the Applicant be

released on furnishing cash bail to the tune of Rs.1,00,000/-;

(iii) The Applicant shall not enter the jurisdiction

of Borivali Police Station where the alleged offence had taken

place;

3-IA-1633-2026 IN BA-2015-2025.doc

(iv) The Applicant will reside in the jurisdiction of

Malad Police Station and will attend the Malad Police Station

every day and submit his attendance;

(v) The Applicant shall be provided one Officer to

escort the Applicant in plain clothes for the said period of 16 th

May, 2026 to 26th May, 2026 (both dates inclusive), the

charges of which will be borne solely by the Applicant. The

escort charges as calculated by the State be deposited in

advance by the Applicant. Needless to say, the Respondent-

State is directed to provide escort immediately upon release

of the Applicant from the jail;

(vi) The Applicant will provide the address, phone

number and the details where he is residing for the period of

16th May, 2026 to 26th May, 2026 (both dates inclusive);

(vii) The Applicant shall not tamper with the

3-IA-1633-2026 IN BA-2015-2025.doc

evidence or attempt to influence or contact the complainant,

witnesses or any person concerned with the case;

(viii) The Applicant to surrender immediately on

27th May, 2026 and shall not seek any further extension. The

Applicant to surrender in the same jail from where he was

released;

(ix) The Interim Application No.1633 of 2026 is

allowed in the aforesaid terms and is accordingly disposed of.

9. List the matter on 28th May, 2026 for compliance of today's

order. In case, the Court is not available on 28 th May, 2026, liberty is

granted to the parties to mention.

10. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter