Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bharti Sahakari Bank Ltd. vs Sanjay Harishchandra Pimpudkar And ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 3028 Bom

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3028 Bom
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Bharti Sahakari Bank Ltd. vs Sanjay Harishchandra Pimpudkar And ... on 25 March, 2026

Author: R.N. Laddha
Bench: R.N. Laddha
  2026:BHC-AS:14223

                          Mamta Kale                                                                                16-apeal-794-2008.docx


                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                               Criminal Appeal No. 794 of 2008
                      Bharti Sahakari Bank Ltd.
                      Having its office at Bharti Bhavan,
                      Lal Bahadur Shastri Road,
                      Pune - 411 030.                                                                               ... Appellant
                           versus
                      1. Sanjay Harishchandra Pimpudkar
                      R/o. Plot No.5, Jawahar Nagar
MAMTA
AMAR KALE
                      Colony, Ganesh Khind Road,
Digitally signed by
MAMTA AMAR KALE
Date: 2026.03.25
18:40:35 +0530
                      Pune - 16.

                      2. The State of Maharashtra                                                                   ...Respondents
                                                                               ----
                      None for the Appellant.
                      Mr Krutik R Kamble h/f Mr Sanjay Kshirsagar, for Respondent
                      No.1.
                      Mr V A Kulkarni, APP, for the Respondent / State.
                                                    ----
                                                         Coram: R.N. Laddha, J.

Date: 25 March 2026 P.C.:

. By way of the present appeal, the appellant (original Complainant) seeks to challenge the acquittal of respondent No.1 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as recorded by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Pune, vide judgment and order

__________________________________________________

25 March 2026

Mamta Kale 16-apeal-794-2008.docx

dated 18 January 2008 in C.C. No.20220 of 2005.

2. Today, when the matter was called out for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the appellant.

3. At the outset, the learned Counsel appearing for respondent No.1 and the learned APP appearing for respondent No.2 / State, drawing the attention of this Court to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Celestium Financial vs A. Gnanasekaran, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320, jointly submit that the proviso to Section 372 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, confers a statutory right upon the appellant to assail the order of acquittal. They further asserted that in order to enable effective exercise of this right and to ensure access to a proper adjudicatory forum, the present appeal be transferred to the competent Sessions Court. Reliance is also placed on (i)Kotak Mahindra Finance Ltd vs Nobiletto Finlease & Investments, Criminal Appeal No. 645 of 2006 dated 31 October 2005, Delhi High Court; (ii)Pooja Trading Company vs Harishchandra Manjrekar, Criminal Appeal No.1016 of 2006 dated 13 October 2025, Bombay High Court; (iii) Shivputra Arwat vs Sangappa Bhasgikar, Criminal Appeal No. 1051 of 2008 dated 8 October 2025, Bombay High Court;

(iv)Salimshah Haji Shakurshan vs Syd. Javdali Syd Anwarali,

__________________________________________________

25 March 2026

Mamta Kale 16-apeal-794-2008.docx

Criminal Appeal No. 167 of 2006 dated 15 October 2025, Bombay High Court at Aurangabad; (v)Pankaj Mehta vs Vishal Hundar, 2026 SCC OnLine MP 800; (vi)Sunil Kumar vs Daljit Kaur, 2025:PHHC:092344; and (vii)Raj Kumar Vs Rajender, 2025:PHHC:079740, to submit that there is no impediment in transferring the present appeal to the concerned Court of Sessions.

4. Considering the submissions advanced and the cited judgments, it is apparent that a victim, including the complainant in proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is entitled to invoke the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to challenge an acquittal. In light of this legal position, it is considered appropriate that the present appeal be transferred to the Court of Sessions having jurisdiction so as to enable the appellant to pursue the statutory remedy before the proper forum.

5. Accordingly, the learned Registrar (Judicial) is directed to take necessary steps for the prompt transmission of the entire record to the concerned Sessions Court. Upon receipt, the Sessions Court shall register the appeal and decide the same on its on merits and in accordance with the law. Considering the

__________________________________________________

25 March 2026

Mamta Kale 16-apeal-794-2008.docx

long pendency of the matter, the learned Sessions Judge is requested to dispose of the appeal expeditiously.

6. The appeal stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

(R.N. Laddha, J.)

__________________________________________________

25 March 2026

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter