Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abhyudaya Co-Operative Bank Ltd, ... vs Shri. Milind Nilkanth Deshmukh And Ors
2026 Latest Caselaw 874 Bom

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 874 Bom
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Abhyudaya Co-Operative Bank Ltd, ... vs Shri. Milind Nilkanth Deshmukh And Ors on 27 January, 2026

Author: Amit Borkar
Bench: Amit Borkar
2026:BHC-AS:3861
                                                                      1-wp-4892-2014 with connected.doc


                       Shabnoor
                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.4892 OF 2014
         Digitally
         signed by
         SHABNOOR
SHABNOOR AYUB
                       Abhyudaya Cooperative Bank Ltd.
AYUB     PATHAN
PATHAN   Date:         Through Senior Manager
         2026.01.27
         19:23:31
         +0530         (Legal & Recovery)                             ... Petitioner
                                  V/s.
                       Milind Nilkanth Deshmukh & Ors.                ... Respondents

                                                          WITH
                                              WRIT PETITION NO.4893 OF 2014

                       Abhyudaya Cooperative Bank Ltd.
                       Through Senior Manager
                       (Legal & Recovery)                             ... Petitioner
                                  V/s.
                       Milind Nilkanth Deshmukh & Ors.                ... Respondents

                                                          WITH
                                              WRIT PETITION NO.4319 OF 2014

                       Abhyudaya Cooperative Bank Ltd.
                       Through Senior Manager
                       (Legal & Recovery)                             ... Petitioner
                                  V/s.
                       Milind Nilkanth Deshmukh & Ors.                ... Respondents



                       Mr. Madhur Rai a/w Yogesh Mishra, Mr. Durgesh
                       Telang i/b PRS Legal, for the Petitioner.
                       Mr. Anil Anturkar, Sr. Advocate i/b Mr. Rushikesh C.
                       Barge, for Respondent No.2.
                       Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Addl. GP, for State - Respondent
                       Nos. 5 & 6 in WP/4892/2014.
                       Ms. Mamta S. Srivastava, AGP, for State - Respondent
                       Nos. 5 & 6 in WP/4893/2014.



                                                            1
                      ::: Uploaded on - 27/01/2026                ::: Downloaded on - 27/01/2026 20:36:12 :::
                                                 1-wp-4892-2014 with connected.doc




 Ms. Savina R. Crasto, AGP, for State - Respondent Nos.
 5 & 6 in WP/4319/2014.


                               CORAM     : AMIT BORKAR, J.

                               DATED     : JANUARY 27, 2026
 P.C.:

 1.      These petitions raise the same legal issues and facts. The
 parties are also common in substance. For that reason, it is proper
 to decide them together. Therefore, all petitions are taken up
 together and disposed of by a common order.

 2.      Respondent No.6 has passed the impugned judgment and
 order. By that decision, respondent No.6 allowed the revision
 applications filed by respondent Nos.2 and 3. In doing so,
 respondent No.6 set aside the certificates issued by respondent
 No.5 under Section 101 of the MCS Act. These certificates
 represent enforceable dues under the statutory scheme of the Act.

 3.      On facts, it is not in dispute that respondent Nos.2 and 3 did
 not deposit the mandatory pre deposit as required by Section
 154(2A) of the MCS Act. This provision requires the revision
 applicant to deposit fifty percent of the recoverable amount before
 the revision is entertained. The object of Section 154(2A) is to
 protect the financial interest of the cooperative credit institution
 and to ensure bona fides of the revision applicant. The Revisional
 Authority cannot bypass this condition. If there is no deposit, the
 revision cannot be heard on merits. Despite this clear mandate, the
 Revisional Authority examined the revision applications on merits



                                    2
::: Uploaded on - 27/01/2026                ::: Downloaded on - 27/01/2026 20:36:12 :::
                                                      1-wp-4892-2014 with connected.doc


 and set aside the certificates. This was legally untenable. The
 impugned orders cannot stand. The certificates under Section 101
 cannot be unsettled in breach of a statutory condition attached to
 the right of revision.

 4.      Having regard to the above, the following order is required.

                                         ORDER

(i) The judgment and order dated 17 July 2006 passed by respondent No.6 in Revision Application Nos.405, 406, and 407 of 2002 are quashed and set aside.

(ii) Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are permitted to deposit an amount of Rs.45 lakh with the Registrar, Appellate Side, Mumbai within one week from today. This will constitute part compliance of fifty percent of the recoverable dues under Section 154(2A) of the MCS Act.

(iii) Respondent Nos.2 and 3 shall deposit the balance amount necessary to complete fifty percent of the recoverable dues as of today. This shall be done within two weeks from today.

(iv) The petitioner bank has stated that the total combined dues in all three petitions as of today are Rs.158.99 lakh. According to bank the total dues are Rs.24.77 lakh in Writ Petition No.4391 of 2017. The total dues are Rs.67.78 lakh in Writ Petition No.4892 of 2014. The total dues are Rs.66.44 lakh in Writ Petition No.4893 of 2014. After crediting Rs.45 lakh, the respondents shall deposit the

1-wp-4892-2014 with connected.doc

balance amount required to constitute fifty percent of the recoverable dues as on 27 January 2026 within two weeks. If the respondents fail to deposit the balance amount within this time, the certificates shall attain finality.

(v) If respondent Nos.2 and 3 deposit fifty percent of the recoverable dues in accordance with Section 154(2A) of the MCS Act, the Revisional Authority shall decide the revision applications on merits in accordance with law.

5. With these directions, all writ petitions stand disposed.

6. There will be no order as to costs.

(AMIT BORKAR, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter