Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ashraf Lalmohammad Ansari vs State Of Maharashtra
2026 Latest Caselaw 1270 Bom

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1270 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2026

[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Ashraf Lalmohammad Ansari vs State Of Maharashtra on 4 February, 2026

2026:BHC-AS:5838                                                          903-BA-4223-2024.DOC




                    Ajit Pathrikar

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4223 OF 2024
                    Ashraf Lalmohammad Ansari                 ...Applicant
                          Versus
                    State Of Maharashtra                      ...Respondent

                    Mr. Sherali S. Khan with Tabish Shaikh and Veeraj Naik, for
                          the Applicant.
                    Mr. Mayur Sonavane, APP for the State-Respondent.
                    API - Vaibhav Chumbale, Kongaon Police Station, is present.


                                                  CORAM          DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.
                                                  DATED:         4th FEBRUARY 2026
                    PC:-


                    1.        The Applicant seeks his release on bail in connection

                    with C.R. No. 345 of 2023 dated 4th November 2023

                    registered with Kongaon Police Station for the offences

                    punishable under Sections 8(c), 22(c) and 29 of the Narcotic

                    Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ("NDPS Act").



                    2.        There are two accused involved in the said case.

                    Accused No.2 is on bail and the Applicant is Accused No.1.

                    While on patrolling duty, the police officials of the Kongaon

                    Police Station found the Applicant lurking in suspicious


                                                            Page 1 of 5
                                                       th
                                                      4 February 2026


                   ::: Uploaded on - 04/02/2026                           ::: Downloaded on - 04/02/2026 20:52:37 :::
                                                    903-BA-4223-2024.DOC




 circumstances. He was apprehended and after following the

 due procedure established under the NDPS Act, was searched.

 On his search, 102 grams of Mephedrone was recovered from

 the right-side pocket of the Applicant's pant. The Applicant

 was arrested on 4th November 2023 pursuant to the

 registration of the FIR.



 3.      The Applicant made an application seeking bail before

 the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwandi. However, by order

 dated 26th July 2024, the said application was rejected. Hence,

 the Applicant is before this Court seeking the relief as prayed.



 4.      Mr. Sherali Khan, learned counsel for the Applicant, has

 brought to my notice various non-compliances on the part of

 the officers. According to him, there is a breach of Sections

 42, 50, 52A, 55 and 57 of the NDPS Act. He submits that the

 seizure panchanama does not contain the signature of the

 Accused. He further submits that the Applicant is in custody

 for as many as two years and five months and till date, the

 charges are not yet framed. In these circumstances, he submits


                                     Page 2 of 5
                                th
                               4 February 2026


::: Uploaded on - 04/02/2026                       ::: Downloaded on - 04/02/2026 20:52:37 :::
                                                    903-BA-4223-2024.DOC




 that there is a delayed and long period of incarceration for

 reasons not attributed to the Applicant.


 5.      Mr. Mayur Sonavane, learned APP, has met with all the

 arguments raised by Mr. Sherali Khan pertaining to the non-

 compliance of the provisions of the NDPS Act. Prima facie, it

 appears that all the compliances have been satisfactorily

 complied with. However, only on the ground of long

 incarceration that the trial has not commenced, the charges

 are not framed and the Applicant is in custody for as many as

 two years and five months, the Applicant deserves to be

 granted bail.

 6.      Considering the long period of incarceration and the fact

 that there are no antecedents against the present Applicant, I

 am inclined to enlarge the Applicant on bail and it ordered as

 under:

                                     ORDER

i) The Applicant be enlarged on bail, on executing PR

Bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one or two local sureties

in the like amount;

th 4 February 2026

903-BA-4223-2024.DOC

ii) The Applicant shall attend the Police Station concerned,

on first Monday of every month between 10:00 a.m. and

12:00 p.m., till the charges are framed. He shall also attend

the Trial Court concerned on each and every date as directed,

till the conclusion of the trial, save and except if the Applicant

is exempted from appearance by orders of the Trial Court.

iii) If the Applicant has not deposited his passport, the

Applicant shall deposit the same with the concerned Police

Station, if any;

iv) The Applicant shall not leave India, without permission

of the trial Court;

v) The Applicant shall not tamper or attempt to influence

or contact the complainant, witnesses or any person

concerned with the case;

vi) The Applicant shall inform his latest place of residence

and mobile contact number immediately after being released

and / or change of residence or mobile details, if any, from

th 4 February 2026

903-BA-4223-2024.DOC

time to time to the Court seized of the matter and to the

Investigating Officer of the concerned Police Station;

vii) The Applicant to co-operate with the conduct of the

trial;

viii) Any infraction of the aforesaid conditions shall entail

cancellation of bail.

7. Application is allowed in the above terms and is

accordingly disposed of.

8. It is made clear that the observations made herein are

prima facie and are confined to this Application and the Trial

Judge to decide the case on its own merits, uninfluenced by

the observations made herein.

(Dr. Neela Gokhale, J)

th 4 February 2026

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter