Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sanaullah Habibullah Khan vs The State Of Maharashtra
2026 Latest Caselaw 1264 Bom

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1264 Bom
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2026

[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Sanaullah Habibullah Khan vs The State Of Maharashtra on 4 February, 2026

2026:BHC-AS:5826

                    Prasad Rajput
                        (P.A.)                                                 9_BA_404_2026.doc




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                       BAIL APPLICATION NO.404 OF 2026


                    Sanaullah Habibullah Khan                                       ...Applicant
                          Versus
                    State of Maharashtra                                            ...Respondent


                    Mr. S.K. Ali i/by Asif Shaikh, for the Applicant.
                    Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for the Respondent - State.


                                                  CORAM          DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.
                                                  DATED:         04TH FEBRUARY 2026
                    PC:-


                    1.               By this Application, the Applicant seeks his

                    enlargement on bail in connection with C.R. No.399 of 2025

                    dated 28th May, 2025 registered with the Shivajinagar Police

                    Station, District: Mumbai, for the offences punishable under

                    Sections 8(c), 21(b) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and

                    Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'NDPS').



                    2.               The case of the prosecution is that during the

                    intervening night of 27th May, 2025 and 28th May, 2025, the



                                                            Page 1 of 6
                                                       th
                                                      4 February 2026


                   ::: Uploaded on - 04/02/2026                           ::: Downloaded on - 04/02/2026 20:52:27 :::
  Prasad Rajput
     (P.A.)                                             9_BA_404_2026.doc


 police officials, while were on patrolling duty near Lotus

 Colony, received information from a secret source that there is

 one person dealing in contraband near Kadri Dairy Gowandi,

 Mumbai. Accordingly, the police officials located the said

 person and after following the due procedure prescribed

 under the NDPS Act, they apprehended and conducted search

 of his person. 5.17 grams of Mephedrone was recovered from

 his person. On interrogation, he revealed the name of Accused

 No.2, from whom he purchased the said contraband.

 Accordingly, police arrested the present Applicant on 10th

 June, 2025. However, no contraband was recovered from the

 present Applicant.



 3.               The Applicant made an application seeking bail

 before the NDPS Special Judge, City Civil & Sessions Court,

 Greater Bombay, however, by order dated 1st December, 2025,

 the said application was rejected. Hence, the Applicant has

 filed the present Bail Application for the reliefs as prayed.




                                     Page 2 of 6
                                th
                               4 February 2026


::: Uploaded on - 04/02/2026                       ::: Downloaded on - 04/02/2026 20:52:27 :::
  Prasad Rajput
     (P.A.)                                             9_BA_404_2026.doc


 4.               Mr. Ali, learned counsel for the Applicant, submits

 that no contraband was recovered from the present Applicant

 nor from his premises. Only on the basis of a statement made

 by Accused No.2, the Applicant was arrested. The Applicant is

 a sole bread winner of his family. Hence, Mr. Ali, prays that

 the Applicant be enlarged on bail.



 5.               Ms. Bajoria, learned APP, states that the Applicant

 is a habitual offender and he has two criminal antecedents;

 one under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code and one

 under the provisions of NDPS Act. She submits that while the

 Applicant was on bail in earlier offence, he has been arrested

 in the present offence. She thus prays that the application be

 rejected.



 6.               I have heard learned counsel for the parties and

 perused the record of the case with their assistance.



 7.               Considering that no contraband was recovered

 from the present Applicant and that 10 grams of Mephedrone



                                     Page 3 of 6
                                th
                               4 February 2026


::: Uploaded on - 04/02/2026                       ::: Downloaded on - 04/02/2026 20:52:27 :::
  Prasad Rajput
     (P.A.)                                             9_BA_404_2026.doc


 was recovered from the present Applicant in the previous case

 registered under the NDPS Act, which is an intermediate

 quantity, I am inclined to enlarge the Applicant on bail. It is

 accordingly ordered as under:-



                                     ORDER

i) The Applicant be enlarged on bail, on

executing PR Bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/ with

one or two local sureties in the like amount;

ii) The Applicant shall attend the Trial Court

concerned on each and every date unless exempted

by the orders of the Trial Court concerned;

iii) The Applicant shall also attend the Police

Station concerned once in a month between 11:00

a.m. to 02:00 p.m., till the charges are framed;

iv) If the Applicant has not deposited his

passport, if any, the Applicant shall deposit the same

with the Police Station concerned;






                                th
                               4 February 2026



  Prasad Rajput
     (P.A.)                                             9_BA_404_2026.doc


       v)         The Applicant shall not leave India, without

the permission of the Trial Court;

vi) The Applicant shall not tamper or attempt to

influence or contact the complainant, witnesses or

any person concerned with the case;

vii) The Applicant shall inform his latest place of

residence and contact number immediately after

being released and / or change of residence or

mobile details, if any, from time to time to the Court

seized of the matter and to the Investigating Officer

of the Police Station concerned;

viii) The Applicant to co-operate with the conduct

of the trial;

ix) Any infraction of the aforesaid conditions

shall entail cancellation of bail.

8. Application is allowed in the above terms and is

accordingly disposed of.






                                th
                               4 February 2026



  Prasad Rajput
     (P.A.)                                                9_BA_404_2026.doc


9. It is made clear that the observations made herein

are prima facie and are confined to this Application and the

learned Trial Judge to decide the case on its own merits,

uninfluenced by the observations made herein.

(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J)

th 4 February 2026

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter