Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinodkumar S/O Gautam Tajane vs State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secy., ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 3640 Bom

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3640 Bom
Judgement Date : 9 April, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Vinodkumar S/O Gautam Tajane vs State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secy., ... on 9 April, 2026

Author: Anil S. Kilor
Bench: Anil S. Kilor
2026:BHC-NAG:5655-DB

                                                  -1-                       WP.1375.2026.odt



                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                            NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
                            WRIT PETITION NO. 1375 OF 2026

                PETITIONER               :          Vinodkumar S/o. Gautam Tajane, Aged
                                                    about 42 Years, Occ. Field Labour,
                                                    R/o. Anjankheda, Post Washim, Distt.
                                                    Washim.

                                                           //VERSUS//

                RESPONDENTS              : 1. State of Maharashtra, through its
                                              Secretary, Home Department,
                                              Mantralaya Mumbai-32.

                                                 2. The Collector, Washim, Dist. Washim.

                                                 3. Superintendent of Police, Washim, Dist.
                                                    Washim.

                                                 4. Inspector/Police Station Officer (Rural),
                                                    Distt. Washim.

                                          5. The Tahsildar, Taluka Washim, Distt.
                                              Washim.
                __________________________________________________________
                  Ms. Janhavi Nagdeve, Advocate h/f. Mr. P.S. Wathore, Advocate for
                  the Petitioner.
                  Mr. N.S. Rao, AGP for the Respondents/State.
                __________________________________________________________
                                CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND
                                        RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ.
                                DATE         :    9th APRIL, 2026.

                ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : RAJ D. WAKODE, J.)

Heard Ms. Janhavi Nagdeve, learned counsel holding for Mr.

P.S. Wathore, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. N.S. Rao,

learned AGP for the respondents/State.

-2- WP.1375.2026.odt

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the

consent of the parties.

3. The petitioner is the Vice-President of the Trust, namely

Bhimshakti Navyuvak Jayanti Utsav Mandal, Anjankheda , Tahsil and

District Washim, bearing Registration No. F-0012303 (WSM). A copy

of the Registration Certificate dated 30 th July, 2024, issued by the

Assistant Charity Commissioner, Washim Division, Washim, is at

record page No.21 (Annexure-B).

4. The petitioner submitted an application on 19 th January,

2026, to respondent No.4, i.e., the Police Station Officer, Washim

(Rural), seeking permission to carry out a procession on the occasion of

the celebration of the 136th Birth Anniversary of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar.

The said application came to be rejected by respondent No.4 vide

communication dated 6th February, 2026.

5. Being aggrieved by the said rejection, the petitioner has

approached this Court by way of the present writ petition.

6. A perusal of the impugned communication reveals that the

application has been rejected primarily on the following grounds:

(i) Shortage of police force,

(ii) Possibility of disturbance to law and order, and

-3- WP.1375.2026.odt

(iii) Alleged criminal antecedents of certain persons belonging to the

petitioner's Trust.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued

that the rejection at the behest of respondent No.4 is arbitrary and

violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution

of India. She further submits that the petitioner is willing to abide by

any reasonable conditions imposed by the authorities if permission is

granted by this Court.

8. Learned AGP has placed on record the communication

issued by respondent No.4, reiterating the same grounds as mentioned

in the impugned communication for rejecting the application. He

submits that, in view of administrative constraints and apprehension of

breach of peace, the permission has been rightly denied, and there is no

merit in the present writ petition. Hence, the same deserves to be

dismissed.

9. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the

material on record. Upon such consideration, we are of the view that the

reasons assigned in the impugned order are general in nature and are

not sufficient to deny the petitioner the right to carry out a peaceful

procession.

-4- WP.1375.2026.odt

10. It is well settled that the right to assemble peacefully and to

take out processions is a fundamental right guaranteed under Article

19(1)(b) of the Constitution of India. Such right, no doubt, is subject to

reasonable restrictions in the interest of public order; however, the

power to regulate does not extend to an arbitrary prohibition.

11. The ground of shortage of police force, in particular, cannot

be a valid justification to deny the exercise of a fundamental right. It is

the duty of the State to make appropriate arrangements to ensure that

lawful activities are carried out in a peaceful manner. Similarly, vague

apprehensions of breach of peace, without any concrete material, cannot

be a ground to reject the request outright.

12. So far as the third ground for rejection of the petitioner's

application is concerned, namely the alleged criminal antecedents of

three persons associated with the petitioner's Trust, learned counsel for

the petitioner has placed on record an affidavit along with a copy of the

Resolution dated 30th April, 2025, passed by the Executive Body of

Bhimshakti Navyuvak Jayanti Utsav Mandal, Anjankheda . By the said

Resolution, it was unanimously resolved that, in view of the criminal

offences registered against Mr. Deepak Subhash Ingole, Mr. Raju

Subhash Ingole, and Mr. Devanand Vasanta Ingole, they be removed

from the petitioner's Trust, and new members be inducted in their

place.

-5- WP.1375.2026.odt

13. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid

action of removal of such members, on account of their criminal

antecedents, was taken more than a year prior, i.e., on 30 th April, 2025.

Therefore, the said ground relied upon by respondent No.4 for

rejection of the petitioner's application no longer survives and loses its

force.

14. In view of the above, in our considered opinion, the

appropriate course for the respondent authorities is to regulate the

procession by imposing suitable conditions so as to maintain law and

order, rather than to prohibit it altogether.

15. Accordingly, we allow the present writ petition in the

following terms:

(i) The impugned communication dated 6th February, 2026,

issued by respondent No.4, i.e., the Police Station Officer, Washim

(Rural), is hereby quashed and set aside.

(ii) The application dated 19th January, 2026, submitted by the

petitioner for grant of permission to carry out a procession on the

occasion of the 136th Birth Anniversary of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, is

hereby allowed; however, only for 14 th April, 2026, as prayed in prayer

Clause (i).

                                 -6-                       WP.1375.2026.odt



(iii)       The petitioner is permitted to take out the procession on

14th April, 2026, on the occasion of the 136 th Birth Anniversary of Dr.

B. R. Ambedkar, subject to the following conditions:

CONDITIONS

(a) The procession shall be conducted only on the route specified

in the application, or such modified route as may be approved

by the Police Authorities.

(b) The procession shall be conducted within the time permitted

by the Police Authorities and shall not cause obstruction to

traffic or inconvenience to the general public.

(c) The participants shall maintain strict discipline and shall not

indulge in any act which may disturb public order.

(d) No participant shall carry any weapon, stick, lathi or any object

capable of causing injury.

(e) No slogans, speeches or songs shall be made which are

inflammatory or which hurt the sentiments of any religion,

caste or community.

(f) Use of sound system shall be strictly in accordance with law

and within permissible limits.

(g) The organizers shall deploy sufficient volunteers to regular the

procession and ensure orderly conduct.

-7- WP.1375.2026.odt

(h) The organizers shall submit details of responsible persons to

the Police Authorities in advance and shall extend full

cooperation.

(i) The Police Authorities shall be at liberty to impose additional

reasonable conditions in the interest of public order and to

regular traffic.

(j) In the event of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall

be open to the Police Authorities to take appropriate action in

accordance with law.

(k) The organizers shall be responsible for any damage caused to

public or private property and shall be liable to compensate the

same.

16. The respondent authorities shall make necessary bandobast

and ensure that the procession is conducted peacefully in compliance of

the aforesaid conditions imposed by this Court.

17. The writ petition is accordingly disposed in above terms.

No order as to costs.

                                 (RAJ D. WAKODE, J.)                               (ANIL S. KILOR, J.)
                              Vijaykumar

Signed by: Mr. Vijay Kumar
Designation: PA To Honourable Judge
Date: 09/04/2026 19:48:19
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter