Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jigar Hemant Shah And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr
2025 Latest Caselaw 4154 Bom

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4154 Bom
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2025

Bombay High Court

Jigar Hemant Shah And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 23 June, 2025

Author: A. S. Gadkari
Bench: A. S. Gadkari
2025:BHC-AS:25719-DB



           Osk                                                         50-Wp-4872-2024.doc



                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 4872 OF 2024

           1.    Jigar Hemant Shah                            ]
                 Age 31 years,                                ]
           2.    Hemant Dungarshi Shah                        ]
                 Age 57 years,                                ]
                 Both adult Indian inhabitants,               ]
                 Residing at A-23/89,                         ]
                 Ambe Niwas, Chittaranjan Nagar,              ]
                 Rajawadi, Ghatkopar (W.),                    ]
                 Mumbai - 400 089.                            ]       ... Petitioners
                          V/s.
           1.    The State of Maharashtra                     ]
                 At the instance of Sr. Insp. of Police,      ]
                 Tilak Nagar Police Station vide their C.R.   ]
                 No. 435 of 2024.                             ]
           2.    Varsha Shashikant Bhoir                      ]
                 Age 44 years, Adult Indian inhabitant,       ]
                 Residing at Room No.3,                       ]
                 Mohammed Nabi Compound, Opp. Ram             ]
                 Mahal Hotel, Kurla (W.), Mumbai.             ]       ... Respondents
                               _______________________________________

           Mr. Ayush Pasbola a/w. Ms. Sakshi Agarwal i/b. Mr. Bipin Joshi for
           Petitioners.
           Ms. Savita M. Yadav, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
           Mr. Pranav Gole i/b. Ms. Mrunal Bhise for Respondent No.2.
           A.P.I. Mr. Dineshkumar Anaule, Tilak Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, present.
                            _______________________________________

                                                                                                1/5


                 ::: Uploaded on - 27/06/2025                 ::: Downloaded on - 28/06/2025 09:29:50 :::
 Osk                                                           50-Wp-4872-2024.doc




                                     CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                             RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.

                                     DATE    : 23rd June 2025.


JUDGMENT ( Per : A. S. GADKARI, J.) :

-

1) Petitioners have invoked jurisdiction of this Court under Article

226 of the Constitution of India for quashing of CR No. 0435 of 2024, dated

3rd September 2024, registered with Tilak Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, for

the offences punishable under Sections 471, 468, 467, 465, 420, 409, 407,

406 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, with the consent of Respondent No.2,

the informant.

2) Heard Mr. Pasbola, learned Advocate for Petitioners, Ms. Yadav,

learned A.P.P. for Respondent No.1 and Mr. Gole, learned Advocate for

Respondent No.2. Perused entire record produced before us.

3) The First Information Report is lodged by Respondent No.2. It is

the precise case of the prosecution that, the Respondent No.2 booked flat No.

407 in the building named as 'Amber Empire', situated at Chembur, Mumbai

and paid an amount of Rs.1,03,00,000/- for the same. Subsequently, the

Respondent No.2 realized that the said project is not legally sanctioned or

there were no necessary permissions granted to it. The Petitioners also

refused to give possession of the said flat to the Respondent No.2. During

this entire process the Respondent No.2 suffered loss of Rs.1,26,85,000/-.

Osk 50-Wp-4872-2024.doc

The Petitioners by accepting the said amount neither handed over possession

of the said flat nor returned the said amount to the Respondent No.2 and

threatened her with serious consequences. In this brief premise present

crime is registered.

4) Mr. Pasbola, learned Advocate for Petitioners submitted that,

during the pendency of investigation, the Petitioners and Respondent No.2

have amicably settled their disputes and differences and have executed

'Memorandum of Understanding' (M.O.U.) dated 28th September 2024. That,

as per the M.O.U., the Respondent No.2 has received the possession of the

said flat and the agreed amount of compensation and therefore she is not

willing to proceed with the said case any further. He submitted that,

Respondent No.2 is giving her consent for quashing of the said crime in view

of the said M.O.U..

5) Mr. Gole, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 tendered across

the bar Affidavit of Respondent No.2, dated 10 th December 2024, duly

affirmed before a Notary Public. In the said Affidavit, the Respondent No.2

has admitted the fact of amicable settlement between the Petitioners and

herself and execution of M.O.U. dated 28 th September 2024. In para No.4

thereof, she has stated that, in pursuance of the said M.O.U. she has received

possession of the said flat along with one car parking space as well as

compensation. In para No.7 thereof, she has given her no objection for

quashing of the crime in-question.

 Osk                                                             50-Wp-4872-2024.doc



5.1)            Respondent No.2 is personally present in the Court and through

her Advocate reiterates the contents of her Affidavit dated 10 th December

2024 and her 'no objection' for quashing of the crime in-question.

6) In view thereof, we are inclined to quash CR No. 0435 of 2024,

dated 3rd September 2024, registered with Tilak Nagar Police Station,

Mumbai, for the offences punishable under Sections 471, 468, 467, 465, 420,

409, 407, 406 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code.

7) As we expressed our opinion for quashing of CR No. 0435 of

2024, dated 3rd September 2024, registered with Tilak Nagar Police Station,

Mumbai, learned Advocate for Petitioners on instructions submitted that, the

Petitioners will pay a cost of Rs.1,00,000/- each, totalling to Rs.2,00,000/-,

jointly or severally, to the Armed Forces Battle Casualties Welfare Fund

within a period of two weeks from the date of uploading of present Order on

the official website of High Court of Bombay. The said statement is accepted

as an undertaking given to this Court.

7.1) We therefore direct the Petitioners to pay a cost of Rs.1,00,000/-

each, totalling to Rs.2,00,000/-, jointly or severally, to the Armed Forces

Battle Casualties Welfare Fund within a period of two weeks from the date of

uploading of present Order on the official website of High Court of Bombay.

7.2) Details of the bank account for payment of cost are as under :-

Account Name :- Armed Forces Battle Casualties Welfare Fund.

                 Osk                                                            50-Wp-4872-2024.doc



                                Account Number :-          90552010165915.
                                Bank Name             :-   Canara Bank.
                                Branch                :-   South Block, Defence Headquarters,
                                                           New Delhi - 110 011.
                                IFSC Code             :-   CNRB0019055.


                7.3)            Petitioners to deposit the said cost within stipulated period as

noted above and submit receipt(s) of the same in the Registry of this Court.

8) In view of the above and subject to payment of cost by the

Petitioners as aforestated, Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).

9) It is made clear that, if the cost is not paid within stipulated

period as mentioned above, the Petition shall stand revived automatically

and in that event, the Investigating Officer shall complete the investigation of

present crime expeditiously.

10) List the Petition on board on 23 rd July 2025, under caption 'For

Reporting Compliance' of present Order.

                           ( RAJESH S. PATIL, J. )                    ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )







OMKAR      KUMBHAKARN
SHIVAHAR
KUMBHAKARN Date:
           2025.06.27
           18:45:58
           +0530








 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter