Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nana Yada Gaikwad vs The Secretary - Shivaji Shikshan ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 1107 Bom

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1107 Bom
Judgement Date : 31 July, 2025

Bombay High Court

Nana Yada Gaikwad vs The Secretary - Shivaji Shikshan ... on 31 July, 2025

Author: Milind N. Jadhav
Bench: Milind N. Jadhav
                                                                           909. CIVIL IAST-21570-25.docx


Amberkar

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                               CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                          INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 21570 OF 2025
                                              IN
                             CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4326 OF 2008

           Nana Yada Gaikwad                                                        Applicant
                                                                                 .. (Org. Petitioner)
                       Versus
           The Secretary,
           Shivaji Shikshan Sanstha, Ghatkopar (E) & Ors. .. Respondents
                                        ....................
            Mr. Brijesh Pathak a/w Ms. Aditi Ravidas & Ms. Vaishnavi Murkute,
              Advocates for Applicant - Org. Petitioner
            Mr. Bapusaheb Dahiphale, AGP for State
                                                     ...................
                                                    CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
                                                    DATE          : JULY 31, 2025
           P. C.:

1. Heard Mr. Pathak, learned Advocate for Applicant - Org.

Petitioner and Mr. Dahiphale, learned AGP for State.

2. Present Interim Application is filed by Applicant - Org. Petitioner

seeking amendment to the Writ Petition.

3. Mr. Pathak would submit that when the Petition was filed in the

year 2008, typed copy of impugned judgment & order dated

10.03.2008 was annexed as Exh. "O" to the Petition wherein paragraph

No. 8 of the impugned judgment was not typed or overlooked

inadvertently by the Advocate. Hence, in order to bring on record the

complete judgment copy, he seeks amendment by replacing the

1 of 2

909. CIVIL IAST-21570-25.docx

incomplete Exh. "O" to the Petition with complete Judgment & Order

dated 10.03.2008.

4. Perused the Interim Application. For the reasons stated therein

Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) . Petitioner

is permitted to amend the Petition by annexing Exhibit 'A' appended to

the present Interim Application, i.e. a copy of the judgment dated

10.03.2008, without replacing the existing typed copy, as an additional

exhibit thereto. Re-verification stands dispensed with. Copy of the

amended Petition shall be served on Respondents.

5. Interim Application is allowed and disposed.

6. Place the Writ Petition on the Final Hearing Board as per its

turn.

Amberkar                                                 [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]



           RAVINDRA MOHAN
           MOHAN    AMBERKAR
           AMBERKAR Date:
                     2025.07.31
                     15:07:27 +0530




                                                                                          2 of 2




 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter