Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1810 Bom
Judgement Date : 24 January, 2025
2025:BHC-NAG:772-DB
20-WP7272.24-J.odt
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 7272 OF 2024
Shri Pawan Ishawar Dadmal,
age about 21, Occupation : Student,
At, Alizanja Po, Talodhi Naik,
Tah.Chimur, Dist.Chandrapur-442903
M.93733346323
Emai. [email protected] ....PETITIONER
-Versus-
The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny
Committee, Chandrapur,
Through its Member Secretary,
Tadoba Road, Tukum, Chandrapur. ....RESPONDENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. N.D.Jambhule, Adv. for the petitioner.
Mr. A.S.Fulzele, Addl.GP for the respondents-State.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE &
ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE : 24TH JANUARY, 2025
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: Avinash G. Gharote, J.)
Heard.
2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of
the learned counsel for the parties.
3. The petition questions the order dated 27/04/2022, passed by the
Tribe Scrutiny Committee, Chandrapur whereby the claim of the petitioner of
belonging to Mana Schedule Tribe has been rejected solely on the ground, that
the petitioner though granted opportunity, did not produce documents
KHUNTE 20-WP7272.24-J.odt
indicating his tribe claim earlier to 1950. The learned counsel for the petitioner
invites our attention to the table in para-12 of the petition, which indicates
documents from 1953, relating to the grandfather of the petitioner indicating
he belonging to Mana Scheduled Tribe. This document or for that matter, the
other documents as indicated in the table have not been considered at all while
passing the impugned decision.
4. Mr.Fulzele, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent-
State, does not dispute, that while considering the tribe claim of the petitioner
not only documents prior to 1950, but all documents, which have a bearing,
even if they are post 1950, having bearing upon the matter in issue need to be
considered for deciding the tribe claim. This in our considered opinion is a
correct and fair statement and indicates the manner in which the tribe claim
has to be decided with weightage to be given to the oldest entries. In that view
of the matter the impugned order dated 27/04/2022, cannot be sustained and
is hereby quashed and set aside and the matter is remitted back to the Tribe
Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Chandrapur for decision afresh by taking into
consideration all documents which may be submitted by the petitioner in
support of his tribe claim. The petitioner shall appear before the Committee on
03/02/2025 without any further notice being required to be issued. The record
which was returned back to the petitioner should also be produced by him
before the Committee on 03/02/2025.
5. Rule is made absolute in the above terms. No costs.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI,J) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J)
Signed by: Mr. G.S. Khunte
Designation: PS To Honourable Judge
Date: 24/01/2025 16:45:19
KHUNTE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!