Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sayyad Rizwan Amir vs The State Of Maharashtra
2025 Latest Caselaw 3768 Bom

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3768 Bom
Judgement Date : 21 August, 2025

Bombay High Court

Sayyad Rizwan Amir vs The State Of Maharashtra on 21 August, 2025

2025:BHC-AUG:22749


                                                  {1}                    ABA 1321 OF 2025


                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                      967 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1321 OF 2025

                 Sayyad Rizwan Amir                        ..Applicant

                              Versus

                 The State of Maharashtra                   ..Respondent
                                                   ...
                 Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Chetan Barku Chaudhari
                 APP for Respondent : Mr.S.B.Narwade
                                                 .....
                                        CORAM :    ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.

                                        RESERVED ON  : 19 AUGUST, 2025
                                        PRONOUNCED ON : 21 AUGUST, 2025

                 ORDER :

1. Apprehending arrest in Crime no.0018 of 2025 registered at

Chalisgaon Road Police Station, District Dhule, for the offence

punishable under Section 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and

under Sections 8 and 22(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances Act (NDPS Act), present application has pressed into

service.

2. Learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that above crime

is registered on alleged receipt of secret information and raid

conducted by Police. It is pointed out that allegations are that {2} ABA 1321 OF 2025

accused Akbar Ali Kaisar was in possession of 480 bottles of cough

syrup which are said to be banned. That, arrested person named

present applicant and as such statement of arrested accused has no

evidentiary value. That, applicant has no concern with said episode.

That, there is nothing to show that applicant sells or distributes

cough syrup, which is banned. That, only on the statement of

arrested person, applicant is tried to be involved. That, applicant is

ready to co-operate with investigating machinery. That, whatever

was to be recovered is already seized, therefore, there is no need of

custody of the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks

reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of

P. Krishna Mohan Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 2025 DGLS (SC)

766.

3. Learned APP has strongly opposed application by pointing out

that acting on secret information that there is illegal sale of banned

cough syrup i.e. without authorization, licence or permission, Police

conducted raid at the given address and one person, who gave his

name as Akbar Ali Kaisar Ali Shah, was found to be in possession of a

sack full of bottles worth Rs.88,520/-. That, he had no papers,

permission or licence and thus, was apprehended. That, after arrest {3} ABA 1321 OF 2025

and further enquiry, learned APP submitted that, said accused Akbar

Ali Kaisar Ali Shah named present applicant to be the main supplier

and he is based in Surat. That, the contraband falls under the NDPS

Act and therefore, for proper investigation, bail application is sought

to be rejected. Learned APP seeks reliance on the judgment of

Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Muraleedharan v. State of Kerala,

(2001) 4 SCC 638.

4. Heard. Perused the papers and FIR dated 29-01-2025. Its

substance is that, Police of Chalisgaon Road Police Station received

secret information about illegal possession and sale of psychotropic

medicine namely Codeine Phosphate and Triprolidine Hydrochloride

Cough Linctus. After obtaining permission from superiors, raiding

team was constituted and accordingly, raid was conducted at a

premises and raiding party came across said Akbar Ali to be in

possession of a sack full of bottles worth Rs.88,520/- and accordingly

same was seized for analysis. Therefore, he was arrested and during

enquiry with him, he seems to have named present applicant.

5. Learned APP pointed out that applicant is resident of Surat,

Gujarat and he is the main supplier and therefore, for proper and {4} ABA 1321 OF 2025

thorough investigation, his custody is necessary.

6. Perused the citation, which is relied of which there is no

dispute that confessional statement by accused has no evidentiary

value, but that is part that dealt in trial. Admittedly, banned

medicine falling under the NDPS Act, full of sack, is recovered

from arrested person and he has named present applicant to be the

main supplier. Therefore, with such allegations, this Court is not

inclined to grant relief as prayed. Accordingly, following order is

passed :

ORDER

Application is rejected.

( ABHAY S. WAGHWASE ) JUDGE

SPT

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter