Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Aatif Ali Meer Athar vs The State Of Mah. Thr. Pso, Old City Akola ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 26461 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26461 Bom
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2024

Bombay High Court

Aatif Ali Meer Athar vs The State Of Mah. Thr. Pso, Old City Akola ... on 17 October, 2024

Author: Vinay Joshi

Bench: Vinay Joshi

2024:BHC-NAG:11861-DB




                                                   1                                 3apl63.2024..odt


                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

                                CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 63 OF 2024

                   Aatif Ali Meer Athar,
                   Aged about 30 yrs, Occ. Student,
                   R/o. Kaynat Cottage Block No. 13,
                   Near Atlas Park Ganga Nagar,
                   Akola                                                               ...... APPLICANT

                        ...V E R S U S...

                   1. The State of Maharashtra,
                   Through PSO Old City, Akola

                   2. Syed Mateen Syed Jamir,
                   Aged about 40 yrs, Occ. Business,
                   R/o. House No. 20, Kaynat Cottage,
                   Ganga Nagar, Old City, Akola                                   .....NON-APPLICANTS
                   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Mr. Z.Z. Haq, Advocate for applicant.
                   Mr. U.R. Phasate, APP for respondent No.1 /State
                   Mr. M.R. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent No.2.
                   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                   CORAM:- VINAY JOSHI & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
                   DATE : 17.10.2024

                   JUDGMENT (Per : Vinay Joshi, J.)

Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard

finally with consent of learned Counsel for the parties.

2. By this application under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, the applicant is seeking to quash and set aside 2 3apl63.2024..odt

the First Information Report (FIR) No. 483/2023, registered at Old

City Police Station, Akola, for offence punishable under Sections

294 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The applicant's contention that after registration of FIR

by the applicant on following day, the existing report has been

maliciously lodged. On merits, it is argued that the contents of FIR

do not disclose the ingredients to constitute an offence punishable

under Sections 294 and 506 of the IPC for which crime has been

registered.

4. Learned APP appearing for respondent No. 1/State as

well as the learned Counsel appearing for respondent No. 2

informant have opposed the application by contending that the

material which is available on record constitutes an offence and

thus it is a matter of trial to appreciate the material on record.

5. We have been taken through the contents of FIR wherein

besides a general abuses, there is nothing from which it could be

construed that there is use of obscene words. The learned Counsel

for the applicant specifically relied on the decision of the Hon'ble 3 3apl63.2024..odt

Supreme Court in the case of N.S. Madhanagopal and Another Vs.

K. Lalitha [(2022)17 SCC 818] with emphasis on the observations

made in paragraph Nos. 7 and 8 of the decison. Our attention is

invited to the portion where it has been observed that mere abusive,

humiliating or defamatory words by itself cannot attract an offence

punishable under Section 294(b) of the IPC. Plain reading of the

FIR discloses that besides two words namely, "gjke[kksj" and

"eknjpksn", there is nothing which could display the obscene words

that too, to the annoyance of others. The FIR further disclose that

general allegations have been made about giving life threats without

specifying the details.

6. In above context, we have considered the incident as a

whole. Undisputedly, the alleged occurrence took place on

14.12.2023 at around 11.00 a.m. and on the very same day, in the

evening, the applicant himself has lodged report leveling similar

allegations against the informant. However, apparently after 24

hours regarding the same incident with same contents the informant

lodged similar report which speaks for itself.

4 3apl63.2024..odt

7. We have also gone through the case diary which speaks

similarly as per the contents of FIR. The essence of Section 294(b)

of the IPC is that the obscene words must have tendency to corrupt

by arousing a lustful desires which is totally absent in the words

allegedly uttered by the applicant. Thus, this case squarely falls in

the criteria Nos. 1 and 3 of the guidelines issued by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal

[AIR (1992) SC 604].

In view of above, the application is allowed.

The First Information Report (FIR) No. 483/2023,

registered at Old City Police Station, Akola, for offence punishable

under Sections 294 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, is hereby

quashed and set aside.

                                            (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)                      (VINAY JOSHI, J.)




                                    R. Belkhede,
Signed by: Mr. R. S. Belkhede       Personal Assistant
Designation: PA To Honourable Judge
Date: 21/10/2024 18:34:22
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter