Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahavir S/O Suganchand Chopda vs The State Of Maharashtra Through ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 772 Bom

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 772 Bom
Judgement Date : 12 January, 2024

Bombay High Court

Mahavir S/O Suganchand Chopda vs The State Of Maharashtra Through ... on 12 January, 2024

Author: G. A. Sanap

Bench: G. A. Sanap

2024:BHC-NAG:577



                                                                                      2.fa.106.2024 judge.odt
                                                            1



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                              NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

                                           FIRST APPEAL NO. 106 OF 2024

                           Mahavir S/o. Suganchand Chopda,
                           Aged 48 Yrs., Occu.: Agriculturists,
                           R/o. Amravati, Tq. & Dist.
                           Distt. Amravati                                                    .... APPELLANT

                                                        // V E R S U S //

                   1.      The State of Maharashtra,
                           through the Collector, Yavatmal

                   2.      Special Land Acquisition Officer,
                           Minor Irrigation Works no.2,
                           Yavatmal

                   3.      The Executive Engineer,
                           Bembla Project Division, Yavatmal,
                           Tq. and Dist. Yavatmal                                         ... RESPONDENTS
                   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Mr A. B. Nakshane Advocate for the appellant
                           Mr Ganesh Umale, AGP for the State/respondent Nos. 1 and 2
                           Mr M. A. Kadu, Advocate for respondent No. 3
                   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                              CORAM : G. A. SANAP, J.
                                              DATE : 12/01/2024

                   ORAL JUDGMENT :
                   1                 Heard.


                   2                 ADMIT. Heard finally with the consent of learned

                   Advocates for the parties.
                                               2.fa.106.2024 judge.odt




3           The land of the appellant bearing Gat Nos. 65/1 and

6/1 was acquired for Bembla River Project vide award dated

09.06.2005. Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition

Act, 1894 was issued on 14.08.2003. Land Acquisition Officer

awarded the compensation @ of Rs.92,907/- (Rupees Ninety Two

Thousand Nine Hundred and Seven only) per hector for 1.21 H.R.

land and @ of Rs.89,150/- (Rupees Eighty Nine Thousand One

Hundred and Fifty Only) per hector for 2.36 H.R. land. In

reference, filed by the appellant, the compensation was enhanced to

Rs.1,75,000/- per hector. The appellant, being aggrieved by this

judgment and order passed by the reference Court dated

02.08.2012 in Land Acquisition Case No. 93 of 2010 has filed this

appeal.

4 I have heard the learned Advocates for the parties.

Perused the record and proceedings.

5 Learned Advocate for the appellant submitted that this

appeal is covered by the decision rendered by the Co-ordinate

2.fa.106.2024 judge.odt

Bench of this Court in First Appeal No. 297 of 2023 (Tejraj S/o.

Sugandchand Chopda .v/s. The State of Maharashtra and others,

decided on 18.08.2023). Learned Advocate submitted that the land

which was subject matter of First Appeal No. 297 of 2023 and the

lands of the appellant are similarly situated. The lands are dry crops

land. Learned Advocate submitted that Co-ordinate Bench of this

Court awarded the compensation @ of Rs.2,10,000/- (Rupess Two

lacs Ten Thousand only) per hector in respect of the dry crop land.

6 Learned AGP submitted that the lands were acquired

under the same award and for the same project.

7 It is seen that the lands are situated in close proximity.

The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in respect of the similarly

situated land i.e. Gat No. 46/2 has awarded the compensation @ of

Rs.2,10,000/- per hector. In my view, therefore, this appeal is

covered by the decision rendered by the Co-ordinate Bench of this

Court in First Appeal No. 297 of 2023. Accordingly, the appeal is

partly allowed.

2.fa.106.2024 judge.odt

8 The appellant is entitled to get the compensation in

respect of his land which is subject matter of this appeal @ of

Rs.2,10,000/- per hector. The appellant is entitled to get the

interest and other statutory benefits as awarded by the reference

Court. The appellant shall not be entitled to get interest and other

benefits for the delayed period i.e. 2696 days.

9 Decree be drawn up accordingly.

10 Respondent No. 3 is directed to deposit the amount as

per this order within six months with the Registry of this Court.

11 The appellant/claimant are required to pay the deficit

Court fee on the enhanced amount of compensation. If the deficit

Court fee is not paid by the appellant/claimant, then the same shall

be recovered/deducted from the enhanced compensation amount.

12 The appeal stands disposed of, accordingly.

(G. A. SANAP, J.) Namrata

Signed by: Miss Namrata Suryawanshi Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 16/01/2024 18:55:28

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter